Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ext3_has_ro_compat_featur".
Did you mean:
ext3_has_ro_compat_feature
2005 Feb 15
1
[PATCH] ext3: Fix sparse -Wbitwise warnings.
...arnings/fs/ext3/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-warnings/fs/ext3/super.c (revision 14)
+++ linux-warnings/fs/ext3/super.c (revision 20)
@@ -2105,13 +2105,13 @@
ext3_mark_recovery_complete(sb, es);
} else {
- __le32 ret;
- if ((ret = EXT3_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
- ~EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SUPP))) {
+ int ret;
+ if ((ret = le32_to_cpu(EXT3_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
+ ~EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SUPP)))) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "EXT3-fs: %s: couldn't "
"remount RDWR because of unsupported "
"...
2001 Mar 28
1
Ext3 and LFS - possible? fatal?
Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together?
Are there good reasons why this should/should not work?
I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt
both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably
localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there
to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that
2005 Jun 20
0
[patch 1/3] fs/ext3/super.c: fix sparse warnings
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: sparse-fs_ext3_super.patch
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20050620/af49961a/attachment.ksh>
2000 Dec 08
2
ext3-0.0.5c released
Hi all,
ext3-0.0.5c is now up at:
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
The most important part of this release is the e2fsprogs: e2fsck now
supports the journal changes for metadata-only journaling.
Ted, I've changed around the use of jfs* include files in e2fsprogs
quite heavily here. In each build directory --- the lib/ext2fs