Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ext3_feature_ro_compat_large_fil".
Did you mean:
ext3_feature_ro_compat_large_file
2001 Mar 28
1
Ext3 and LFS - possible? fatal?
Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together?
Are there good reasons why this should/should not work?
I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt
both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably
localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there
to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that
2003 Mar 06
0
Re: re problems with ext3 well if think it is
...s: 002b
This looks like a bug that Andrew Morton posted a patch for recently:
> Under rare conditions (filesystem corruption, really) it is possible
> for ext3_dirty_inode() to require _two_ blocks for the transaction: one
> for the inode and one to update the superblock - to set
> EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE. This causes the filesystem to go
> BUG.
>
> So reserve an additional block for that eventuality.
fs/ext3/inode.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 25/fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3-transaction-reserved-blocks Sat Dec 14 18:28:21 2002
+++ 25-akpm/fs/ext3/inode.c Sa...
2000 Dec 08
2
ext3-0.0.5c released
Hi all,
ext3-0.0.5c is now up at:
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
The most important part of this release is the e2fsprogs: e2fsck now
supports the journal changes for metadata-only journaling.
Ted, I've changed around the use of jfs* include files in e2fsprogs
quite heavily here. In each build directory --- the lib/ext2fs