search for: ext2prepare

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ext2prepare".

Did you mean: ext2_prepare
2005 Feb 07
3
e2fsck errors after lvextend when trying to resize2fs
I found a thread that has almost the exact same symptoms as me, but didn't seem to come to a resolution: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2004-December/msg00018.html I have an LVM(2) array that I've just lvextend'd and want to resize2fs, but I can't get through the e2fsck. I get these errors when fsck-ing: Group 3125's inode table at 102400545 conflicts with
2001 Dec 20
2
Size of journal and resize
Hello I have some large Partiton at 2 GB, 4 GB, 7 GB, 13 GB, 25 GB. How big I need the journal for its? Could I resize ext3fs with resize2fs, ext2resize-1.17 (with ext2prepare, ext2online), parted-1.4.21 Tools? The Partititons Magic 5.0 I can't use with ext3 only with ext2. -- MfG / With best Regards Rusmir Duško Registered Linux user: #130654 http://counter.li.org
2005 Jan 07
0
e2fsprogs 1.36-rc1 released on SourceForge
...recover using the following procedure after installing e2fsprogs 1.36: debugfs -w /dev/hdXXX -R "features ^resize_inode" e2fsck -f /dev/hdXXX This will remove the resize_inode feature, and correct the filesystem corruption. If you would like to use on-line resizing, you can then run ext2prepare, which should restore the resize_inode correctly. I'm asking people who are willing to be guinea pigs to download and try out e2fsprogs 1.36-rc1. Also, since I don't run Fedora myself, the e2fsprogs.spec file may need some tweaking. If you do download and try it, please let me know how i...
2006 Mar 17
1
[RFC] mke2fs with DIR_INDEX, RESIZE_INODE by default
I've been thinking recently that we should re-enable DIR_INDEX in mke2fs by default. When it first came out, we had done this and were bitten by a few bugs in the code. However, this code has been in heavy use for several thousand filesystem years in Lustre, if not elsewhere, and I'm inclined to think it is pretty safe these days. Likewise, RHEL/FC have had RESIZE_INODE as a standard
2006 May 07
1
Fedora Core 4 and FC5's NEW EXT3 file system: "Reserved GDT blocks" ???
Hi, I've installed a few Fedora Core 4 and Fedora Core 5 recently, and found that the new ext3 file systems created with new mkfs.ext3(1.38+) has one more field than EXT3 created with old mkfs.ext3(1.34-), even the latter's dir_index feature was turned on and file systems were upgraded with "e2fsck -y -f -D" command. I have three questions thereafter: 1) what does the
2004 Dec 09
1
resize2fs on LVM on MD raid on Fedora Core 3 - inode table conflicts in fsck
Hi. I'm attempting to setup a box here to be a file-server for all my data. I'm attempting to resize an ext3 partition to demonstrate this capability to myself before fully committing to this system as the primary data storage. I'm having some problems resizing an ext3 filesystem after I've resized the underlying logical volume. Following the ext3 resize, fsck spits out lots