Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "exractor".
Did you mean:
extractor
2012 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] Taking over work on CodeExtractor, spiffing it up, and making it nice & easy to use
Dear Chandler,
> Please let me know if you have out-of-tree users of this logic
At KernelGen we have an out-of-tree variation of CodeExractor called
BranchedCodeExractor [1], which instead of taking a code region into a new
function, does it conditionally:
ORIGINAL_CODE;
->>
if (extracted_code_function(args) != -1)
{
ORIGINAL_CODE;
}
I think many hybrid and parallelizing tools need the same logic. For
instance, LLVM Polly sh...
2012 May 02
1
[LLVMdev] Taking over work on CodeExtractor, spiffing it up, and making it nice & easy to use
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Dmitry N. Mikushin <maemarcus at gmail.com>wrote:
> At KernelGen we have an out-of-tree variation of CodeExractor called
> BranchedCodeExractor [1], which instead of taking a code region into a new
> function, does it conditionally:
>
OK... as this is an out-of-tree branch of the code extraction, nothing I'm
planning should negatively impact it... I don't know your use case, so I
don't ha...
2012 May 02
2
[LLVMdev] Taking over work on CodeExtractor, spiffing it up, and making it nice & easy to use
Hello folks,
Just as a heads up, I chatted with Owen today about a little known bit of
LLVM: lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp
A toy project of mine has a use for this functionality, and it still seems
to mostly work, so I'm going to be spending some time doing cleanup and
general maintenance on the code to make it easier and more suitable for
consumption by actual optimization passes.