search for: exprnatom

Hi Nick, Thanks for your reply. On 8/23/2013 3:40 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > > These are the changes I plan to make, and some questions that I have > > a) Define a new contentType for DefinedAtoms to say 'Expression' > b) Create a new class ExprnAtom derived from DefinedAtom > c) The expression could also contain various functions that could be set in the expression, how should that be represented ? > I don’t understand this. I thought expression where like "_foo + 10”. What do you mean by functions set in expression? Linker script...

...there for the expression evaluator to find the addresses of the symbols used. >> >> -Nick > > > These are the changes I plan to make, and some questions that I have > > a) Define a new contentType for DefinedAtoms to say 'Expression' > b) Create a new class ExprnAtom derived from DefinedAtom > c) The expression could also contain various functions that could be set in the expression, how should that be represented ? I don’t understand this. I thought expression where like "_foo + 10”. What do you mean by functions set in expression? > d) The actua...

..., > > Thanks for your reply. > > On 8/23/2013 3:40 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> >> These are the changes I plan to make, and some questions that I have >> >> a) Define a new contentType for DefinedAtoms to say 'Expression' >> b) Create a new class ExprnAtom derived from DefinedAtom >> c) The expression could also contain various functions that could be set in the expression, how should that be represented ? >> I don’t understand this. I thought expression where like "_foo + 10”. What do you mean by functions set in expression? >...

...Writer knows is not a relocation, but there for the expression evaluator to find the addresses of the symbols used. > > -Nick These are the changes I plan to make, and some questions that I have a) Define a new contentType for DefinedAtoms to say 'Expression' b) Create a new class ExprnAtom derived from DefinedAtom c) The expression could also contain various functions that could be set in the expression, how should that be represented ? d) The actual content of the Atom would be a string representation of the expression, that can be used to emit YAML information e)The expression tr...

...> Thanks for your reply. > > > On 8/23/2013 3:40 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > >> >> These are the changes I plan to make, and some questions that I have >> >> a) Define a new contentType for DefinedAtoms to say 'Expression' >> b) Create a new class ExprnAtom derived from DefinedAtom >> c) The expression could also contain various functions that could be set >> in the expression, how should that be represented ? >> I don’t understand this. I thought expression where like "_foo + 10”. >> What do you mean by functions set in...

On Aug 22, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I am planning to work on adding support for definining expressions for the Gnu flavor. > > Currently Gnu ld supports an option --defsym symbol=expression. The expression may be

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > These are the changes I plan to make, and some questions that I have > > a) Define a new contentType for DefinedAtoms to say 'Expression' b) Create a new class ExprnAtom derived from DefinedAtom > c) The expression could also contain various functions that could be set > in the expression, how should that be represented ? > d) The actual content of the Atom would be a string representation of the > expression, that can be used to emit YAML information &...