search for: exprimenting

...e use unless use is unreachable! Assert2(DT->dominates(Op, &I) || !DT->dominates(&BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock(), BB), "Instruction does not dominate all uses!", Op, &I); Question: Is it possible to switch off/disable this checks? I'm exprimenting with speeding up the instruction scheduling and instruction selection and these checks in Verifer.cpp introduce too much of interference with results of my optimizations, so that it becomes difficult to decide what are the most time-consuming parts of the compiler. Thanks, -Roman...

Hi everybody Attached you will find a file pxe.mnu (encoded with mime). It is PXE menu file created by 3COM MBA IMGEdit.exe tool. It is very strange since: 1) When I point DHCP bootfile to this file it loads with no problem and the menu is displayed. 2) When I point DHCP bootfile to pxelinux.0 and in pxelinux.cfg I put the command "KERNEL pxe.mnu" then system hangs. I wonder why this

I''ve just released a new version of Selenium on Rails[1]. It''s a plugin that makes it easy to test Rails applications through browsers using Selenium [2]. The major new features are exprimental support for running all tests through a Rake task (which launches any number of browsers) and a new format RSelenese. The Rake task has a few rough edges so I would appreciate if

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: asking for help on syslinux Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:37:14 +0800 From: Wu, Ming M <ming.m.wu at intel.com> To: <david at weekly.org> Hi, David: I am doing some experiment on syslinux and its derivative extlinux, and I am quite confused To the concept of extlinux. Seems extlinux need to modify the MBR of the hard disk. Am I right?

Hi, I've just started using Compiz. I'm running Debian testing on a HP/Compaq nc4400 laptop, and I've installed Compiz from the exprimental repository, 0.3.6 I believe, since the 0.2.2 in testing was rather old. In general I have very few problems, besides having to change my ways of working due to a radically different interface :-) I did run into one thing I don't quite

Greetings, I am currently having a problem using smbclient (Samba v2.05a) running on Solaris 2.5.1 to restore a tar file from a tape drive onto a Win NT share. smbclient works successfully when using a tar file on disk, but is skipping the tar file (created by a third party) on the tape drive. The command used is as follows: smbclient //celeborn/test -U peter -T x /dev/rmt/0 The problem

I used the tool wine-config-sidenet from http://sidenet.ddo.jp/winetips/config.html which works great. I installed wine 20041201 as recommended and started wine-config-sidenet setup program and IE6 seemed to run great however, some URLs didn't work for example: www.arkia.co.il. Looking at the FAQ I noticed I should install dcom98.exe. When installing it I got windows popup stating:

Hello, We would like to begin discussions around a new set of intrinsics, to better express multi-dimensional array indexing within LLVM. The motivations and a possible design are sketched out below. Rendered RFC link here <https://github.com/bollu/llvm-multidim-array-indexing-proposal/blob/master/RFC.md> Raw markdown: # Introducing a new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic ## The

> It seems that the main advantage of your proposal is that it would allow for non-constant strides (i.e. variable length arrays) in dimensions other than the first one. Do these appear frequently enough in the programs that you're interested in to be worth optimizing for? Yes - at least in Chapel (which is one of the motivating languages) these are very common. In other words, typical

We could also simply extend the existing inrange mechanism to non-constantexpr GEPs.  It would remove an inconsistency in the semantics, be relatively straight forward, and solve the motivating example. (I didn't read the proposal in full, so there may be other examples it doesn't solve.) Philip On 7/22/19 10:01 AM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev wrote: > The restrictions of

It's also very common in Fortran. -David Michael Ferguson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> It seems that the main advantage of your proposal is that it would >> allow for non-constant strides (i.e. variable length arrays) in >> dimensions other than the first one. Do these appear frequently >> enough in the programs

Intrinsics can return `llvm_any_ty` (Intrinsics.td). In that case the return type is added as a suffix to the intrinsic's name, i.e. the syntax in the RFC is not 100% the syntax for intrinsics. Same for the parameters which each must have their types explicitly mentioned. Michael Am Mo., 22. Juli 2019 um 19:08 Uhr schrieb Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>: > > Is it

What is this??????????????????????????????????????? > -----Original Message----- > From: samba@samba.org [mailto:samba@samba.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 3:06 AM > To: Bernhard Bruscha > Subject: SAMBA digest 2259 > > > SAMBA Digest 2259 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: