Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "expr_set".
Did you mean:
exp_net
2023 Jun 02
3
[Bug 1686] New: Transparent proxy support requires transport protocol match
...r hook prerouting priority mangle; policy accept;
meta l4proto { tcp, udp } tproxy to :1088 mark set 0x1 accept
}
}
This script works.
I check source and I found that:
https://git.netfilter.org/nftables/tree/src/expression.c#n748
> ...
> else if (right->etype == EXPR_SET) {
> ...
This `relational_expr_pctx_update` function only handle EXPR_SET, but
not EXPR_SET_REF,
which leads to fucntion `stmt_evaluate_tproxy` failing at
https://git.netfilter.org/nftables/tree/src/evaluate.c#n3859
because of `pctx->protocol[PROTO_BASE_TRANSPORT_HDR].desc` unset.
"&q...
2024 Aug 02
4
[Bug 1763] New: Segfault when resetting rules with meta l4proto { tcp, udp }
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1763
Bug ID: 1763
Summary: Segfault when resetting rules with meta l4proto { tcp,
udp }
Product: nftables
Version: 1.0.x
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Ubuntu
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: nft