search for: expr_evalu

...9;t list any information: $ sudo nft list table ip test table ip test { chain input { } } It seems like a memory corruption: ==14445== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ==14445== Access not within mapped region at address 0x7C96F0D7 ==14445== at 0x40B171: expr_evaluate (evaluate.c:1059) ==14445== by 0x40B870: expr_evaluate (evaluate.c:220) ==14445== by 0x40CE26: list_member_evaluate (evaluate.c:597) ==14445== by 0x40B318: expr_evaluate (evaluate.c:677) ==14445== by 0x40B7AE: expr_evaluate (evaluate.c:878) ==14445== by 0x40CFB7: rule_evaluate (ev...

...AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: eric at regit.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 The following operation causes a crash: nft add rule ip6 filter input position 4 meta protocol icmpv6 accept 1035 switch ((*expr)->ops->type) { (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000409225 in expr_evaluate (ctx=ctx at entry=0x7fffffffd8c0, expr=expr at entry=0x639638) at src/evaluate.c:1035 #1 0x00000000004093ee in expr_evaluate_symbol (expr=0x639638, ctx=0x7fffffffd8c0) at src/evaluate.c:216 #2 expr_evaluate (ctx=ctx at entry=0x7fffffffd8c0, expr=expr at entry=0x639638) at src/evaluate.c:1037 #...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915 Summary: segfault in error case : expr_evaluate_payload not checking payload->payload.desc being null Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft A...

...input ip protocol 89 accept Starting program: /usr/sbin/nft add rule ip filter input ip protocol 89 accept Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000411cb9 in payload_expr_pctx_update () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000411cb9 in payload_expr_pctx_update () #1 0x000000000040f5d6 in expr_evaluate () #2 0x000000000040dd8c in stmt_evaluate () #3 0x0000000000410eec in rule_evaluate () #4 0x000000000042d332 in nft_parse () #5 0x0000000000406b4d in nft_run () #6 0x000000000040676d in main () Assistance appreciated! Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all...

...gmentation fault. 0x0000000000417136 in payload_expr_pctx_update (ctx=0x7fffffffe748, expr=0x6767f0) at payload.c:88 88 assert(desc->base <= PROTO_BASE_MAX); #0 0x0000000000417136 in payload_expr_pctx_update (ctx=0x7fffffffe748, expr=0x6767f0) at payload.c:88 #1 0x0000000000413453 in expr_evaluate_relational (ctx=0x7fffffffe708, expr=0x6768c8) at evaluate.c:1436 #2 0x0000000000413a26 in expr_evaluate (ctx=0x7fffffffe708, expr=0x6768c8) at evaluate.c:1584 #3 0x0000000000413a84 in stmt_evaluate_expr (ctx=0x7fffffffe708, stmt=0x676880) at evaluate.c:1593 #4 0x0000000000415289 in stmt_eval...