search for: exportb

The NBD spec says that if a client requests SET_META_CONTEXT for exportA, but later requests NBD_OPT_GO/EXPORT_NAME for exportB, then the server should reject NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS requests (that is, the context returned for exportA need not apply to exportB). When we originally added base:allocation, our argument was that we always ignore export names, so it was easier to just treat any two export names as being the same e...

The NBD spec says that if a client requests SET_META_CONTEXT for exportA, but later requests NBD_OPT_GO/EXPORT_NAME for exportB, then the server should reject NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS requests (that is, the context returned for exportA need not apply to exportB). When we originally added base:allocation, our argument was that we always ignore export names, so it was easier to just treat any two export names as being the same e...

The first one is the nastiest - it is an assertion failure caused by a spec-compliant client and introduced by our security fix that was released in 1.14.1. Eric Blake (4): server: Fix regression for NBD_OPT_INFO before NBD_OPT_GO server: Fix back-to-back SET_META_CONTEXT server: Forbid NUL in export and context names server: Fix OPT_GO on different export than SET_META_CONTEXT

Since the v1 series (0/4, at [1]), I've applied patches 1 and 2, rewritten patch 3 [Forbid NUL in export and context names] into patch 4 here, patch 4 there turned into patch 6 here, and everything else here is new. [1]https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/msg00180.html I don't know if there is a handy reusable function for checking whether a string contains valid