search for: export_symbols

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check to journal_init - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 the following unused global functions: - journal.c: __journal_internal_check - journal.c: journal_ack_err - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

This patch contains the following cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check to journal_init - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL: - journal.c: journal_recover Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk

I have ext3 0.0.6b + 2.2.19 and cannot get ext3 to compile as a module. If I try to modularize it, or turn in off completely, the kernel build fails. Is there an easy fix for this, or is there something that I am missing? Thanks. Peter

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > block implementation will be able to use it. > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> Why don't we merge this patch together with the block module? > --- > V0 --> V1: > Removed "default n" for configu options

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > > > block implementation will be able to use it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:34:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:26:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > Change core

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:57:44AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:51:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:34:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:26:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1223 Bug ID: 1223 Summary: libmnl does not compile with #undef HAVE_VISIBILITY_HIDDEN Product: libmnl Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: libmnl

Assumes hypervisor interface headers have been sync-ed after the hypervisor side patch was applied. As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27.3 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2008-10-24/arch/i386/mm/highmem-xen.c =================================================================== ---

Hi, I had to modify 2 files to integrate ext3 patch with lvs patch.. (ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8.gz and ipvs 0.8.2) --- drivers/block/loop.c.orig Tue Nov 6 10:13:48 2001 +++ drivers/block/loop.c Tue Nov 6 10:17:55 2001 @@ -218,14 +218,16 @@ static int lo_send(struct loop_device *l index++; pos += size; UnlockPage(page); -

Hi Thomas. Some minor things and some bikeshedding too. One general^Wbikeshedding thing - unint32_t is used in many places. And then s64 in one place. Seems like two concepts are mixed. Maybe be consistent and use u32, s32 everywhere? I did not read the code carefully enough to understand it. I cannot give a r-b or a-b - as I feel I need to understand it to do so. Sam On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at

Hi Thomas. Some minor things and some bikeshedding too. One general^Wbikeshedding thing - unint32_t is used in many places. And then s64 in one place. Seems like two concepts are mixed. Maybe be consistent and use u32, s32 everywhere? I did not read the code carefully enough to understand it. I cannot give a r-b or a-b - as I feel I need to understand it to do so. Sam On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at

When trying to build ext3 as a module, I get the follwing errors during the kernel link: /usr/bin/kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/brian/src/kernel-2.2.19-pre6mvd/linux-2.2.19pre6-kdb-ext3/include -c -o dummy_sym.o dummy_sym.c ld -m elf_i386 -T /home/brian/src/kernel-2.2.19-pre6mvd/linux-2.2.19pre6-kdb-ext3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_t ask.o -Map map

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 05:15:49PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c > index 23c7500eea7d..c08bc7eb20bd 100644 > --- a/mm/slab_common.c > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c > @@ -1707,17 +1707,17 @@ void *krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(krealloc); > > /** > - * kzfree - like kfree but zero memory

On 10/24/2014 06:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:53:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> The additional register pressure may just cause a few more register moves >> which should be negligible in the overall performance . The additional >> icache pressure, however, may have some impact on performance. I was trying >> to balance the performance of

On 10/24/2014 06:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:53:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> The additional register pressure may just cause a few more register moves >> which should be negligible in the overall performance . The additional >> icache pressure, however, may have some impact on performance. I was trying >> to balance the performance of

The type |struct drm_gem_vram_object| implements a GEM object for simple framebuffer devices with dedicated video memory. The BO is either located in VRAM or system memory. The implementation has been created from the respective code in ast, bochs and mgag200. These drivers copy their implementation from each other; except for the names of several data types. The helpers are currently build with

The type |struct drm_gem_vram_object| implements a GEM object for simple framebuffer devices with dedicated video memory. The BO is either located in VRAM or system memory. The implementation has been created from the respective code in ast, bochs and mgag200. These drivers copy their implementation from each other; except for the names of several data types. The helpers are currently build with

We want to copy from iov to buf, so the direction was wrong. Note: no real user for the helper, but it will be used by future features. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c index 08ad0d1f0476..a0a2d74967ef 100644 ---