search for: expoerted

29.06.2012, 12:17, "ryan" <stdstack at gmail.com>: > I tried some other configurations. Now with llvm 3.0 + clang 3.0, and expoert CC to be clang -flto -use-gold-plugin,and other ENV variables. > Good news is the "no archive symbol error message" is gone, but bad news is new error messages appear Why are you using outdated llvm and clang? -- Regards, Konstantin

I tried some other configurations. Now with llvm 3.0 + clang 3.0, and expoert CC to be clang -flto -use-gold-plugin, and other ENV variables. Good news is the "no archive symbol error message" is gone, but bad news is new error messages appear > /path/to/ld: error: ../mysys/libmysys.a: member at 8758 is not an ELF > object > /path/to/ld: error: ../mysys/libmysys.a: member at

Thanks for replying! I didn't install the new binutils to system directory in case it messes thing up. For ranlib, from the error message, it seems to be the reason. But even I export RANLIB=/bin/true, clean the code and rebuild, it still fails with the same message. I created a symlink in /usr/lib/bfd-plugins as suggested in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-March/030101.html.

Hi, i'm trying to setup Asterisk to work with GnuGK using the Openh323 channel driver. I have a Gatekeeper that gets H.323 calls from a Cisco GW. To this Gatekeeper I've registered some endpoints, Cisco ATA186, Snom 100, etc. Now i want send the numbers 083xxx into Asterisk. Easy, i'll just enter something like this into oh323.conf: gwprefix=083 And all my calls starting with 083

# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> # Date 1320922479 0 # Node ID bc79b560aafa1e4dc42af00e6a326dc651b5636a # Parent 460b507e15f864dd6712f5040e36538d6e076ae4 libxl: use named options for tsc_mode. It seems that this knob is expoerted from the hypervisor as a raw integer (no symbolic names) documented in xen/include/asm-x86. Propagating that all the way to the end user is hardly friendly (it''s bad enough in the hypercall interface). Add an enum at the libxl level with a hopefully descriptive set of names. Deprecate the...

I'm trying to enumerate different combinations to get a workable solution. At least this combination passed the previously failed step, but got stuck in later ones. Also my GCC is still 4.5, so llvm 3.0 is not that outdated? Regards, Ryan On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>wrote: > > 29.06.2012, 12:17, "ryan" <stdstack at