search for: explictly

...there is a > problem about resizing the extended partition: whether the extended > partition is automatically resized (expanded or shrunk) by virt-resize > based on the resizing of logical partitions? > > All the cases can be categorized as these two: > > 1. user doesn't explictly resize the extended partition. In this case it > seems reasonable to automatically expand the extended partition as well. > > 2. user explictly resizes the extended partition. If the extended > partition is resized as user requested, then we should deal with the > conflicts...

...on: whether the extended > > > partition is automatically resized (expanded or shrunk) by virt-resize > > > based on the resizing of logical partitions? > > > > > > All the cases can be categorized as these two: > > > > > > 1. user doesn't explictly resize the extended partition. In this case it > > > seems reasonable to automatically expand the extended partition as well. > > > > > > 2. user explictly resizes the extended partition. If the extended > > > partition is resized as user requested, then w...

...resizing the extended partition: whether the extended > > partition is automatically resized (expanded or shrunk) by virt-resize > > based on the resizing of logical partitions? > > > > All the cases can be categorized as these two: > > > > 1. user doesn't explictly resize the extended partition. In this case it > > seems reasonable to automatically expand the extended partition as well. > > > > 2. user explictly resizes the extended partition. If the extended > > partition is resized as user requested, then we should deal with t...

...> > > partition is automatically resized (expanded or shrunk) by virt-resize > > > > based on the resizing of logical partitions? > > > > > > > > All the cases can be categorized as these two: > > > > > > > > 1. user doesn't explictly resize the extended partition. In this case it > > > > seems reasonable to automatically expand the extended partition as well. > > > > > > > > 2. user explictly resizes the extended partition. If the extended > > > > partition is resized as us...

...on: whether the extended > > > partition is automatically resized (expanded or shrunk) by virt-resize > > > based on the resizing of logical partitions? > > > > > > All the cases can be categorized as these two: > > > > > > 1. user doesn't explictly resize the extended partition. In this case it > > > seems reasonable to automatically expand the extended partition as well. > > > > > > 2. user explictly resizes the extended partition. If the extended > > > partition is resized as user requested, then w...

Dear all, in an LDA analysis with n groups n-1 LD functions result. Implicitly this defines an LD fucntion for the last group. Does there exist code already to explictly construct this LD function? Thanks, Stefan

It appears that the runtime for an R script can more than double if a few references to a function foo() are replaced by more explict references of the form pkgname::foo(). The more explicit references are of course required when two loaded packages define the same function. I can understand why use of this mechanism is not free in an interpreted environment like R, but the cost seems rather

Hi everyone, I'm thinking about breaking up a large package I have to avoid loading some of the more specialised parts when it isn't necessary. The package is dependent on shared libraries. The base one will keep all of the core stuff like constructors etc and the specialised parts will need to access these. It is obviously possible to set the "local" flag to false, however

...g/Checking_for_new_messages_in_other_folders_-_Thunderbird it should be sufficient to enable one setting -- given that the IMAP server returns the STATUS command correctly. I still run Dovecot 1.0 (from Debian 4.0), and it seems this version doesn't support the IMAP STATUS command, as I have to explictly query each folder with the second mentioned setting. What is the recommended way of checking all folders for new mails? Is there any server-side setting I can activate? Do newer versions of Dovecot support the STATUS command in the way Thunderbird expects it? Or does Dovecot even offer an option l...

Hello everyone, I am just trying to colloct all my function into a new packages. I met two questions which hurt me so much: 1. when I use the "prompt" to help to write Rd file for a variable x which is character vector, say x <- c("a","b"), it always give the error informaion: Error in get(x, envir, mode, inherits) : variable "a" was not found.

...On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:55?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > > > While I'm sure this is good for RHEL/rawhide users who care about FIPS, > > > Portable OpenSSH won't be able to merge this. We explictly aim to support > > > LibreSSL's libcrypto as well as openssl-1.1.x and neither supports the > > > OSSL_PARAM_BLD API (neither does BoringSSL, though our support for that > > > I'd describe as "best effort"). > > > > > > If this changes...

Hi Rich, This is rebase of v5 series. Meanwhile, I found a bug when shrinking partitions, and the fix is incuded in this version (patch 2). Regards, Hu changes to v4: 1. add support to resize extended partition (--resize or --expand extended partition) 2. fix the problem of deficit of 512 bytes when expanding a logical partition (this problem can be reproduced in v4 by only expanding a

...SSH being FIPS > > compliant (using OpenSSL). The problem is, the old API does not use the FIPS > > module, therefore the change is needed for the new API. While I'm sure this is good for RHEL/rawhide users who care about FIPS, Portable OpenSSH won't be able to merge this. We explictly aim to support LibreSSL's libcrypto as well as openssl-1.1.x and neither supports the OSSL_PARAM_BLD API (neither does BoringSSL, though our support for that I'd describe as "best effort"). If this changes we can look again. -d

...t; compliant (using OpenSSL). The problem is, the old API does not use the FIPS > > > > module, therefore the change is needed for the new API. > > While I'm sure this is good for RHEL/rawhide users who care about FIPS, > Portable OpenSSH won't be able to merge this. We explictly aim to support > LibreSSL's libcrypto as well as openssl-1.1.x and neither supports the > OSSL_PARAM_BLD API (neither does BoringSSL, though our support for that > I'd describe as "best effort"). > > If this changes we can look again. Yes, we understand and respect...

Hi ! I''ve pasted Rails Recipe #31: Authentication code, but I wish to use these methods in several controllers. Then I pasted them in ApplicationController, using before_filter method in all the other needed controllers. The problem is that Rails always tries to render a missing template inside the current controller ( app/views/controllers/admin/article/signin_form.rhtml ) while

...# put this in a loop over each column to create the de-meaned X matrix mat2 <- matrix(0, 9,3) for(i in 1:3){ mat2[,i] <- mat[,i] - ave(mat[,i], mat$id) } # Or use mapply as follows mat[,1:3]-mapply(ave, mat[,1:3], MoreArgs=list(mat$id)) Both work, but they require that the model matrix is explictly created and then used in the regression. For example, assume I am using the star data in the mlmRev package data(star, package='mlmRev') I would first need to explictly create the model matrix for the fixed effects as follows and then use the strategy above to de-mean this matrix. mat...

Dear All, I have a matrix m of the form  m             [,1]             [,2]   [1,]  9072.302 0.00000004462366   [2,]  9086.811 0.00000005628169   [3,]  9101.320 0.00000007126347   [4,]  9115.830 0.00000008986976   [5,]  9130.339 0.00000011260000   [6,]  9144.848 0.00000014018405   [7,]  9159.357 0.00000017344229   [8,]  9173.866 0.00000021363563   [9,]  9188.375 0.00000026389996  [10,]  9202.884

> Currently, i have nodes with PMTUDiscovery =yes and ClampMSS = yes. Hello, these features were introduced in 1.0.13 correct ?? I also understand that the two settings are by default "yes" if not explictly set to "no" in the config file. what may happen if I have a network with mixed versions from 1.0.11 and 1.0.13, where the older daemons do not implement that feature ?? it is better to explicitly disable the feature in that case ? (it is not very handy to upgrade all at once because som...

The wiki encourages us to use Samba 4 even for non DC domain members. Sounds great. but... What if the system is dependent on unix file permissions. I have numerous shares with explict force group, create mask, etc options. What if we don't want to emulate ntfs style permissions? Will Samba 4 honor that? Just a dumb question before updating my production servers...

...zing logical partitions is enabled, there is a problem about resizing the extended partition: whether the extended partition is automatically resized (expanded or shrunk) by virt-resize based on the resizing of logical partitions? All the cases can be categorized as these two: 1. user doesn't explictly resize the extended partition. In this case it seems reasonable to automatically expand the extended partition as well. 2. user explictly resizes the extended partition. If the extended partition is resized as user requested, then we should deal with the conflicts about resizing extended...