search for: expliciting

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:25:04PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > The reset control API has two modes: exclusive access, where the driver > expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset > line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset > deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line > while inactive.

The reset control API has two modes: exclusive access, where the driver expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line while inactive. Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting reset

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, The Doctor wrote: > Got you. Will run make tests. So far running on > FreeBSD 11.0 using openssl 1.0.2 current Thanks! > Trying Openssl 1.1 Won't work - see the thread here about 6 week back... -d

Hi, Some LLVM classes (e.g. ReturnInst) have explicit constructors with at least two parameters (with no default arguments). Why is that? E.g. what are they trying to prevent? -- Gaby -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150314/4d4cc6cc/attachment.html>

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > I'd like to start a new thread about explicit fence synchronization. This time > with a Nouveau twist. :-) > > First, let me define what I understand by implicit/explicit sync: > > Implicit synchronization > * Fences are attached to buffers > * Kernel manages fences

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:43:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I'd like to start a new thread about explicit fence synchronization. This time > > with a Nouveau twist. :-) > > > > First, let me define what I understand by implicit/explicit sync:

dear list On the samba.org pages there is an overview of Samba GUI's. I've recently (via a post on this mailinglist) discovered http://ldapadmin.sourceforge.net/ It looks very good. Anyone using it here? Experiences? A specific reason why it it not listed on the Samba GUI page? Regards, mj

31.07.2024 09:38, Anoop C S via samba wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-31 at 08:36 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> The problem is that ceph is disabled by configure even if it is >> explicitly enabled by the command-line switch.? Configure should fail >> here instead of continuing, - *that* is the problem. > > This is/was always the situation because building

Hi, I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source: class xxx explicit { }; int main (int argc, char **argv) { return 0; } and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain this error: nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id { ^ 1 error generated. But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes. It’s a bug? -------------- next part

Hello! Is there a way to force explicit register usage (e.g. %r15 in amd64 architecture) in LLVM assembly code? I was proposed in #llvm channel at irc.oftc.net to use inline assembly but i find it rather impractical in my case. Is there any other way? Thanx, ~y.

On 9/29/14 8:42 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:43:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> >>> I'd like to start a new thread about explicit fence synchronization. This time >>> with a Nouveau twist. :-) >>>

Hello Yiannis, You could write a custom backend that doesn't allocate %r15 for general usage. The normal way to do this is to set up a custom calling convention for all functions that keeps a sentinel in %r15 so that it always holds the sentinel. This is how new operating systems are supported with custom ABIs. The only problem is that you cannot be assured that %r15 stays put between

On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:44:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:59:51PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > Yes, that will probably work! So, just to reiterate that I understood you and > > Daniel correctly: > > > > - de-stage sync_fence and it's user space API (the tedious part) > > - add dma-buf ioctls for extracting and attaching

Hi, This one is probably an easy one, but is very troubling to me. I can''t just say: script/server and watch WEBrick start. I have to say: ruby script/server The first line in the server script is: #!/usr/bin/env ruby which invokes ruby just fine on the command line. For fun, I changed the line to point directly to my executable: #!/usr/local/bin/ruby But still, same result.

> > I did some experiments about a year ago with different hand-written > assembly implementations of error handling control flow patterns and it > was really hard to beat the checked return on recent Intel hardware. > This was a microbenchmark, so didn't see effects from increased cache > usage. That's a very interesting result. Thanks for the insights! Just out of

Hi Lang, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 22:03, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > When you say your code is not getting optimized, do you mean that IR optimizations are not being applied, or that codegen optimizations are not being applied? > > What do you see if you dump the modules before/after running the pass manager on them, like this: > > dbgs() << "Before

Nyx wrote: > Hello, > > I would just like to ask if it's possible to explicitly free allocas. This > is because I need to call functions that take structs of different sizes as > input, (possibly inside of loops) and I would rather avoid a stack overflow. You can't explicitly free a specific alloca, but you can use the llvm.stacksave and llvm.stackrestore intrinsics to

IT WORKS!!! I can telnet, ftp, rsh... to my Samba 3.0.1 box (Solaris 9 sparc) here is (at the end) my pam.conf (in case somebody is interested in) The trick is commenting "other accound... winbind..." string in pam.conf! My English is corrupted wnen i'm full #other account sufficient /usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so.1 Thanks Andrew Barlett! and since now i just LOVE SAMBA

Hey list, Does anything exist that can show me which lines are explicitly tested? RCov is great, but it doesn''t really give a sense of _actual_ coverage, indeed, there is no guarantee that functions executed were in fact called as the result of a line being tested. I know nothing of the rspec internals, but would a simple list of executed lines be a relatively simple feature to add?

All users whose "logon script" values have not been explicitly defined automagically inherit the value that "logon script" is set to in smb.conf. And one can change the "logon script" for all such users simply by changing said value in smb.conf. However, once a logon script value value has been explicitly defined for a user this inheritance ability (as the explicit