search for: explicit

...full and immediate control over the state of the reset > line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset > deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line > while inactive. > > Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting > reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls > to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset > control behavior. > > This series converts all drivers that currently implicitly request > exclusive reset con...

...e driver expects to have full and immediate control over the state of the reset line, and shared (clock-like) access, where drivers only request reset deassertion while active, but don't care about the state of the reset line while inactive. Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset control behavior. This series converts all drivers that currently implicitly request exclusive reset controls to the corresponding exp...

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, The Doctor wrote: > Got you. Will run make tests. So far running on > FreeBSD 11.0 using openssl 1.0.2 current Thanks! > Trying Openssl 1.1 Won't work - see the thread here about 6 week back... -d

Hi, Some LLVM classes (e.g. ReturnInst) have explicit constructors with at least two parameters (with no default arguments). Why is that? E.g. what are they trying to prevent? -- Gaby -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150314/4d4cc6cc/attachment...

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > I'd like to start a new thread about explicit fence synchronization. This time > with a Nouveau twist. :-) > > First, let me define what I understand by implicit/explicit sync: > > Implicit synchronization > * Fences are attached to buffers > * Kernel manages fences automatically based on buffer read/write access >...

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:43:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I'd like to start a new thread about explicit fence synchronization. This time > > with a Nouveau twist. :-) > > > > First, let me define what I understand by implicit/explicit sync: > > > > Implicit synchronization > > * Fences are attached to buffers > > * Kernel manages fences automatically based...

dear list On the samba.org pages there is an overview of Samba GUI's. I've recently (via a post on this mailinglist) discovered http://ldapadmin.sourceforge.net/ It looks very good. Anyone using it here? Experiences? A specific reason why it it not listed on the Samba GUI page? Regards, mj

Hi, I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source: class xxx explicit { }; int main (int argc, char **argv) { return 0; } and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain this error: nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id { ^ 1 error generated. But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes. It’s a bug? -------------- next part ------...

Hello! Is there a way to force explicit register usage (e.g. %r15 in amd64 architecture) in LLVM assembly code? I was proposed in #llvm channel at irc.oftc.net to use inline assembly but i find it rather impractical in my case. Is there any other way? Thanx, ~y.

On 9/29/14 8:42 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:43:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> >>> I'd like to start a new thread about explicit fence synchronization. This time >>> with a Nouveau twist. :-) >>> >>> First, let me define what I understand by implicit/explicit sync: >>> >>> Implicit synchronization >>> * Fences are attached to buffers >>> * Kernel manages fences...

...entinel in %r15 so that it always holds the sentinel. This is how new operating systems are supported with custom ABIs. The only problem is that you cannot be assured that %r15 stays put between function calls such as for an interrupt. If you had asked "Is there another EASY way to force explicit register usage?" the answer would have been "No." --Sam Crow ----- Original Message ---- > From: Yiannis Tsiouris <yiannis.tsiouris at gmail.com> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Cc: Chris Stavrakakis <hydralisk.r at gmail.com> > Sent: Sat, April 2, 2011 9:...

...1PM +0300, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > Yes, that will probably work! So, just to reiterate that I understood you and > > Daniel correctly: > > > > - de-stage sync_fence and it's user space API (the tedious part) > > - add dma-buf ioctls for extracting and attaching explicit fences > > - Nouveau specific: allow flagging gem buffers for explicit sync > > - do not check pre-fences from explicitly synced buffers at submit > > - continue to attach a shared fence after submit so that pinning and > > unmapping continue to work > >...

...ruby script/server The first line in the server script is: #!/usr/bin/env ruby which invokes ruby just fine on the command line. For fun, I changed the line to point directly to my executable: #!/usr/local/bin/ruby But still, same result. I just get my prompt back. But invoking the script explicitly with ruby in front of it actually starts WEBrick. This may seem minor, but none of the online examples I see for UNIX uses the explicit ruby command. #! should work fine, right? I happen to be experiencing other problems (with FastCGI and Typo), and I''m wondering if they might be relat...

...nchmark, so didn't see effects from increased cache > usage. That's a very interesting result. Thanks for the insights! Just out of curiosity, did you remember how much slowdown you get between checked return and no check at all (simply ignore the error)? There's also the fact that explicit error checking lets the programmer > simplify the CFG explicitly. If you're calling two functions that don't > depend on any data flow between them, you can do something like: > > auto a = someFn(); > auto b = someOtherFn(); > if (!a || !b) > doSomeErrorHandlin...

...I expect that output to be the same for both ORC and ORCv2. If not something is going wrong with IR optimization. Well for ORCV2 there is no change before and after. I also get this message: JIT session error: Symbols not found: { raise_error } Yes raise_error and all other extern functions are explicitly added as global symbols. > > CodeGen optimization seems a more likely culprit: JITTargetMachineBuilder and ExecutionEngineBuilder have different defaults for their CodeGen opt-level. JITTargetMachineBuilder defaults to CodeGenOpt::None, and ExecutionEngineBuilder default to CodeGenOpt::Def...

Nyx wrote: > Hello, > > I would just like to ask if it's possible to explicitly free allocas. This > is because I need to call functions that take structs of different sizes as > input, (possibly inside of loops) and I would rather avoid a stack overflow. You can't explicitly free a specific alloca, but you can use the llvm.stacksave and llvm.stackrestore intrins...

...0.1 and 3.0.2rc tested on solaris 9 and worked OK!) Sincerely yours, Mike bash-2.05# cat /etc/pam.conf # #ident "@(#)pam.conf 1.20 02/01/23 SMI" # # Copyright 1996-2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. # Use is subject to license terms. # # PAM configuration # # Unless explicitly defined, all services use the modules # defined in the "other" section. # # Modules are defined with relative pathnames, i.e., they are # relative to /usr/lib/security/$ISA. Absolute path names, as # present in this file in previous releases are still acceptable. # # Authentication mana...

Hey list, Does anything exist that can show me which lines are explicitly tested? RCov is great, but it doesn''t really give a sense of _actual_ coverage, indeed, there is no guarantee that functions executed were in fact called as the result of a line being tested. I know nothing of the rspec internals, but would a simple list of executed lines be a relativel...

All users whose "logon script" values have not been explicitly defined automagically inherit the value that "logon script" is set to in smb.conf. And one can change the "logon script" for all such users simply by changing said value in smb.conf. However, once a logon script value value has been explicitly defined for a user this inheritan...

Hello, I would just like to ask if it's possible to explicitly free allocas. This is because I need to call functions that take structs of different sizes as input, (possibly inside of loops) and I would rather avoid a stack overflow. If this is not possible, an alternate solution would be for me to allocate an array of bytes larger than all the struct type...