Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "expliciltly".
Did you mean:
explicictly
2010 Feb 16
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM+OCaml Bindings for the latest LLVM is slower than 2.6
...asserting value handle still pointed to this value!
UNREACHABLE executed at
/mnt/eclipse/acg/users/jianzhou/download/llvm-2.6/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp:492!
Aborted
I had some problem to debug assertions in C++ from OCaml, so did not
figure out the root cause yet.
But it is fixed anyway.
Do we need to expliciltly release (dispose_module) a module in OCaml
at the end of a program?
The C++ tutorial does not call dispose_module in C++. When should I
use this interface?
Thanks
Jianzhou
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Test.ml
Type: application/octet-stream
Siz...
2008 Jul 20
4
Access to values of function arguments
Does anyone know of good reading material about the following? The R language
definition does not appear to explicitly address my problem (maybe I misread
that document?)
I have a function definition:
func(a)
cat("Anova for variable ",a)
What I wish to achieve is to call func with a value such as:
func(Age)
and then obtain:
Anova for variable Age
Using