search for: expensive

I''m just learning Rails and have encountered a problem trying to set a field in a DB record based on the value of another form input field. Using the scaffold code, the create works as expected and the update (edit) also works. However, one of the DB fields (amount) is supposed to be computer from another (units): if the category field is "Mileage", amount= units *

I''ve been following the rails/osx tutorial at http://developer.apple.com/tools/rubyonrails.html This develops a simple application with expenses and accounts. Near the end of the tutorial, there is a view which allows expenses to be added to an account. This view has the "parent" @account rendered, then iterates throught @account.expenses to display the existing accounts,

After much ado about the naming of model adn controllers... model : Expense controller : Expenses route : map.resources :expenses Here I am using mysql database and created a unique index, since db:migrated created an id object and made it as primary key. Now in the def create @expense = Expense.new(params[:expense]) if @expense.save flash[:viola] = ''New expense saved.. be

Hello There, As a new comer to RoR, I started to follow the article http://developer.apple.com/tools/developonrailsleopard.html. In short you create to entities and one one-to-many relation linking them. Everything was good until the establishment of the relation. I am unable to go any further than "Linking Models Together" : I can create the "vendors" mentionned in the

I’ve had another look, and some of the failing tests don’t use temporary files, so I don’t think this is a case of tests having side-effects. Instead, I’ve noticed that in the build log (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/6552/steps/build-unified-tree/logs/stdio), llvm-tblgen.exe is built (my patch modified it), but the table-generation steps of the main build (importantly, ARMGenAsmMatcher.inc) do not appear to be running. I think this would explain the FileCheck output from those failing tests....

Hello All, Yesterday i put RoR with Locomotive. I am very happy :p. So I follow this tuto (http://developer.apple.com/tools/rubyonrails.html). I used Sqlite. my database.yml # MySQL (default setup). Versions 4.1 and 5.0 are recommended. # # Get the fast C bindings: # gem install mysql # (on OS X: gem install mysql -- --include=/usr/local/lib) # And be sure to use new-style password

...t happened otherwise. ‫בתאריך יום ו׳, 21 באפר׳ 2017 ב-18:29 מאת ‪Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev‬‏ <‪ llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org‬‏>:‬ > For reasons I’m not sure about it needs a clean build every so often - > I’ve forced a build at > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/1341 > and its gone green again. > > On 21 Apr 2017, at 15:17, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > One of my commits earlier today (r300964) is causing > llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win to fail with...

...e end of the sequence is reached. The Java style is to have a separate "hasNext" method on the iterator object that says whether or not the sequence is finished. So the question is, what's the trade-off. In most languages that support exceptions, you tend to think of exceptions as expensive operations that should only be thrown if something truly "exceptional" happens. OTOH, the Java case is also made worse by the fact that a large part of the time you'll be using the more expensive interface dispatching, rather than simple vtable dispatching. I would imagine that f...

Hi, I''ve got a Rails app working that includes two two classes, etc.: Expense & Vendor. I eventually learned that the mental concept I had of their relationship should be express in Rails as: class Expense < ActiveRecord::Base; belongs_to :vendor; end class Vendor < ActiveRecord::Base; has_many :expenses; end

Hi, One of my commits earlier today (r300964) is causing llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win to fail with a compilation error (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/1331 <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/1331>) and I'm having trouble figuring out why. I had seen something similar b...

Hi, I currently I have a Samba share configured as follows: [pub_fileshare] comment = Public fileshare path = /u02/pub guest ok = Yes writeable = Yes There is a subfolder under /u02/pub called /u02/pub/expenses/hardware that I need to make read only. How do I do this? I am new to using Samba. I configured the share /u02/pub/expenses/hardware using the configuration below. This works as it is

Check out the proposed prices when this is approved. BELL CANADA REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC EVALUATION FOR THE TARIFF REVISION OF Bell Canada's Access Services Tariff Item 315 ? Zero-Dialed Emergency Call Routing Service (0-ECRS) *2 March 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 GENERAL 3 1.1 Purpose of the Study 3 2.0 SERVICE DESCRIPTION 3 2.1 Service Characteristics 3 2.2

Just like the subject sais - how expensive is it to execute a lot of these commands to keep track of different things in asterisk? I have avoided doing this because it feels a bit like a risk to spam the asterisk CLI this way, but is it really? CPU-wise it doesn't seem very expensive to do it 100 times a second (from a simple test I d...

Just as an exercise I am tying to add colours to a geom_segment command. I can get one colour but not a sequence of colours. Can anyone suggest how I can get the green lines in the plot below to be different colours? I thought I could use a palatte of colours but that did not seem to work. Thanks ========================================================================= library(ggplot2) xx

...s entirely on your goal. In reality, often what you really want is something to say "hey, i've got this pointer over here, and i really want to hoist it up here. Do something, tell me if that is possible". (This is actually why i'm a fan of CFL-AA. You can essentially make it as expensive or not expensive as you want, and it still does really well in pracftice in time) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160325/a8173694/attachment.html>

I''ve got two entities created by scaffolding: Expense & Vendor In Expense#new there''s a form with a Vendors-drop-down and a NewVendor- button. The latter button brings up Vendor#new. The Create button in Vendor#new brings up Vendor#show with Edit & Back links. I want to append a third link conditionally to Vendor#show: if the Expense#new form led to the Vendor#show

...Do something, tell me if that is > possible". > And this is one motivation of my current research: how can various precision dimensions of a pointer analysis be effectively driven by its client. > (This is actually why i'm a fan of CFL-AA. You can essentially make it > as expensive or not expensive as you want, and it still does really > well in pracftice in time) > Again, "making it as expensive or not expensive as you want" is not something unique about cfl-aa. With the right tweak one can also do it with a traditional solver. The real interesting questio...

1st: I am a newbie to Rails & to pure OO. Q: I want to use rails for creating a "master-detail" form. page layout will allow users to type in an "expense report header" and as many "expense report lines" as they need to. I understand how to wrap the final submit action using "transaction" to ensure the inserts to the database happen within the same

hi, in the masq file''s documentation, there is a sentence: "If you have a static IP on that interface, listing it here makes processing of output packets a little less expensive for the firewall." this realy means that SNAT to the primary address is less expensive than a MASQ rules in the netfilter? is this documented anywhere in iptables/netfilter? thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

Hi, I've been browsing for FXO devices, and I'm really surprised at their costs. Why such devices are so expensive and somehow hard to get ? Samy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030805/a92ee327/attachment.htm