search for: expedience

Hello, I''m struggling my brain with this ajax issue ... Basically I have a form for creating records, and I want to submit it using Ajax. On previous versions of RoR (2.0.2) it was working, but the same methods doesn''t work on 2.2.2, and I started to make changes and changes and read forums and the api, but no way ... <% form_remote_for (:expedient, :url => {:action

Would anyone have experience or a prediction about the feasibility of using the pre-compiled solaris 2.5.1 executable on a solaris 2.5.0 system? Thanks for any advice on how well this might work. Frank R.Brown Frank.R.Brown@MailAndNews

This is some ramblings on why using proxy ARP (on a host in a DMZ) is a good or bad thing. The good is that a computer X retains a public IP address which makes it easy to connect it directly to the net if the firewall has to be taken down for extended periods. Thus, if computer X is a mail server for example, it can still function in a reduced capacity until the firewall is restored. The bad

Hi all, I'm having trouble getting access to the pwr. This is on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, 64 bit. I'm installing pwr via packages.install('pwr'), and loading it via library(pwr), both of which appear successful. Strangely, I never get access to the pwr object in R. I tried installing it to /usr/local/lib/R/site-library and ~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library. I also tried installing it

On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: > The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF > shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. > Information on other interesting topics too. on a site hosted in Russia which appears to be FULL of copyright violations. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere

I just went through upgrading from 2.0.7 on Redhat 7.0 using the binary RPM provided by samba.org and noticed a problem with the swat install. It seems that the swat binary in the RPM is built to look for it's supporting files in /usr/share/samba/swat whereas the RPM installs said files in /usr/share/swat. This results in the following error message when you try to access swat: 400 Server

How can I find out, in llvm-c API, whether a basic block is well formed? In C++ I could call getTerminator and test for NULL. -- Seo Sanghyeon

On 2008-12-19, at 09:18, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > How can I find out, in llvm-c API, whether a basic block is well > formed? In C++ I could call getTerminator and test for NULL. There's not currently a binding for this. In general, there's incomplete support for inspection and analysis through the C bindings. BasicBlock::getTerminator() is just a convenient way to spell for

On Tue, February 10, 2015 4:04 pm, Warren Young wrote: >> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:12 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the >>> PDF >>> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >>>

--- Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:33:48AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > since I've been getting a lot of requests, we're planning to do a > > run of FLAC shirts at cost if there is enough real demand. there's > > also a slogan contest for what goes on the back. for details see > > Not going with the new frog

|Hi i''m New First Question: to use a script.aculo.us it needs to include prototype.js and scriptaculous.js.... but doesn''t work!!; instead ||using ||scriptaculous.shrunk of Alister Cameron, work; what are the expedient to use to include the ||scriptaculous.js ? Second question: in script.aculo.us |Ajax.Autocompleter

Hi all: I have two data sets. Set A includes a long list of hits in a single column, say: m$V1 10 15 36 37 38 44 45 57 61 62 69 ...and so on Set B includes just a few key ranges set up by way of a minimum in column X and a maximum in column Y. Say, n$X n$Y 30 38 # range from 30 to 38 52 62 # range from 52 to 62 I would like the output to be the rows containing the following columns:

I've integrated patches from Chris and Martin into the -mm tree. I'll be sending out the patches shortly after testing with my (still in progress!) Linux LDT test suite. First interface quirk came up. It looks like Xen wants to return errors from hypercalls: +static inline int install_ldt_entry (__u32 *lp, __u32 entry_1, __u32 entry_2) +{ + unsigned long mach_lp =

I've integrated patches from Chris and Martin into the -mm tree. I'll be sending out the patches shortly after testing with my (still in progress!) Linux LDT test suite. First interface quirk came up. It looks like Xen wants to return errors from hypercalls: +static inline int install_ldt_entry (__u32 *lp, __u32 entry_1, __u32 entry_2) +{ + unsigned long mach_lp =

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dovecot version: 2.2.15 >> Tinycdb: 0.78 >> >> I'm attempting to compile dovecot --with-cdb, but keep getting into a >> problem with cdb: >>

...lt; NR_VIRQS; virq++ ) { - if ( (irq = virq_to_irq[virq]) == -1 ) + if ( (irq = PCPU_GET(virq_to_irq)[virq]) == -1 ) continue; /* Get a new binding from Xen. */ @@ -512,6 +570,20 @@ } } +void +ap_evtchn_init(int cpu) +{ + int i; + + /* XXX -- expedience hack */ + PCPU_SET(virq_to_irq, (int *)&virq_to_irq[cpu]); + PCPU_SET(ipi_to_evtchn, (int *)&ipi_to_evtchn[cpu]); + + /* No VIRQ -> IRQ mappings. */ + for ( i = 0; i < NR_VIRQS; i++ ) + PCPU_GET(virq_to_irq)[i] = -1; +} + static void evtchn_init(void *dummy __un...

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as > packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the > LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed > that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass() > function so they can be added to the PassManager, but

Hello, Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass() function so they can be added to the PassManager, but LowerPacked doesn't have this... What should I do?

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:22 PM, G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > I would say it is a mis-feature. If the 'x' argument of diag() is a > vector of length 1, then it creates an identity matrix of that size, > instead of creating a 1x1 matrix with the given value: > > ? diag(3) > [,1] [,2] [,3] > [1,] 1 0 0 > [2,] 0 1 0

I've replaced disks in a hardware RAID 1 with larger disks and enlarged the array. Now I have to find a way to tell LVM about the extra space. It seems there are two ways: 1. delete partition with fdisk and recreate a larger one. This is obviously a bit tricky if you do not want to lose data, I haven't investigated further yet. 2. create another partition on the disk, pvcreate another