search for: expectationnotmeterror

...page So that I can get a birds eye view of the system Scenario: Publisher with no videos When visiting / Then viewer should see companies/show_initial F 1 scenarios: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 pending FAILURES: 1) View Home Page (Publisher with no videos) FAILED Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected /Welcome/, got "" /Users/alvin/workspace/rspec-stories/config/../vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/expectations.rb:52:in `fail_with'' /Users/alvin/workspace/rspec-stories/config/../vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/expectations/handler.rb:21:in `handle_matcher'' /Us...

Hello! I''m just a caveman with some caveman questions. I''ve been parsing Rspec for quite a while, and I''m writing my first series of specs. My initial impressions are "Verbose, but understandable. Helpful and intuitive, but so much to digest." I want to congratulate the folks who are dedicating a chunk of their lives to writing this, and ask 2 caveman

...sert select. What I''ve just cobbled together is this addition to my spec_helper.rb: module Spec module Rails class AssertSelectWrapper def should_not_have(*opts) begin should_have(*opts) rescue Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError else fail_with("Expected no matching elements but at least one was detected.") end end end end end module ActionController class TestResponse def should_not_have(*opts) __assert_sel...

...ion[:user].should_be_nil > end > end > > The result: > > A user logging out > - should unset :user in controller.session > - should unset :user in session (FAILED - 1) > - should be redirected > - should delete remember_me token > > 1) > Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError in ''A user logging out > should unset :user in session'' > 1 should be nil > ./spec/controllers/account_controller_spec.rb:149:in `should > unset :user in session'' > > Throwing a breakpoint in and examining the two reveals: > > >> session &gt...

Hi, I am trying to code an application that is based on Rspec; I am programmatically building examples, and launching the runner with a custom formatter. Here are the code snippets from my app: Launching the runner: example_groups = test_expectation.example_groups_for(system_state) @output = StringIO.new options =

...1 When I create a movie Caddyshack in the Comedy genre # features/step_definitions/movie_steps.rb:1 Then Caddyshack should be in the Comedy genre # features/step_definitions/movie_steps.rb:10 expected there to be content "1 movie" in "" (RSpec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError) ./features/step_definitions/movie_steps.rb:14:in `/^Caddyshack should be in the Comedy genre$/'' features/create_movie.feature:10:in `Then Caddyshack should be in the Comedy genre'' I''m sort of confused anyway, because in the RSpec book I''m told to us...

Hi all, In GOOS[1] they use an assertion called assertEventually which samples the system for a success state until a certain timeout has elapsed. This allows you to synchronise the tests with asynchronous code. Do we have an equivalent of that in the Ruby / RSpec world already? I know capybara has wait_until { } but that''s fairly rudimentary - the failure message isn''t very

My spec contains: response.should_have_tag "<legend>", :content => "Add new Contact" The output is: Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError in ''The ResourceController should do something when I try to edit contacts'' .. <legend>Add new Contact</legend> .. should include [[{:content=>"Add new Contact", :tag=>"<legend>"}]] This looks right to me... Jay Levitt

...ot;should[_be] <arbitrary operator>:" do specify "should pass when != operator returns true" do (2+2).should != 3 end end and the result. $ bin/spec spec/spec/expectations/helper/ \ -s "should pass when != operator returns true" F 1) Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError in ''should[_be] <arbitrary operator>: should pass when != operator returns true'' 4 should == 3 ./spec/spec/expectations/helper//should_be_arbitrary_operator_spec.rb:14:in `should pass when != operator returns true'' Finished in 0.000647 seconds 1 specification, 1 f...

I have an input field with an id which has a value. The web_steps.rb method does not find the value. Is this the right step to use to check an input field? It works fine for a text_area but not an input. Scenario steps (tried both ways): Then the "travel_card_number_gate" field should contain "5" Then the "#travel_card_number_gate" field should contain "5"

Hello How can I test equality with two objects when they include some attribute that is BigDecimal? if I make something like this: it "should ...whatever" do obj = Factory.create(:my_object) ... MyObject.first.should == obj end. FAILS This fails because the object expected is different from the object gotten, and the only difference are the BigDecimal attributes, that are

There''s another quirk I wanted to bring up. It''s about the failure message with should_equal and should_be. x.should_equal 2 a.should_not_be nil When they fail they yield messages like: 1 should equal 2 nil should not be nil When I''m caught off guard, which can be often, these messages confuse me. 1 should equal 2? No it shouldn''t. nil should not be

...ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.5.9/lib/spec/rake/../../../bin/spec" "spec/controllers/forum_controller_spec.rb" "spec/controllers/home_controller_spec.rb" "spec/controllers/links_controller_spec.rb" "spec/controllers/user_controller_spec.rb" .......F. 1) ExpectationNotMetError in ''The UserController should not allow new users without the correct fields'' ActionController::TestResponse #<ActionController::TestResponse:0x24d6880 @body="<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN\"\n\t\"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml1...