Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "expect_death".
Did you mean:
expect_data
2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
...5952&pathrev=145953
with...
Index: lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc
===================================================================
--- lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (revision 170724)
+++ lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (working copy)
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceEvent
EXPECT_DEATH(TestGCDSourceEvent(), "Shadow byte and word");
}
-TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceCancel) {
+TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, DISABLED_GCDSourceCancel) {
// Make sure the whole ASan report is printed, i.e. that we don't die
// on a CHECK.
EXPECT_DEATH(TestGCDSourceCancel(), &q...
2012 Dec 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
...gt;
> Index: lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (revision 170724)
> +++ lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (working copy)
> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceEvent
> EXPECT_DEATH(TestGCDSourceEvent(), "Shadow byte and word");
> }
>
> -TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceCancel) {
> +TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, DISABLED_GCDSourceCancel) {
> // Make sure the whole ASan report is printed, i.e. that we don't die
> // on a CHECK.
> EXPEC...
2012 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
...asan/tests/asan_test.cc
>> ===================================================================
>> --- lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (revision 170724)
>> +++ lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (working copy)
>> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceEvent
>> EXPECT_DEATH(TestGCDSourceEvent(), "Shadow byte and word");
>> }
>>
>> -TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceCancel) {
>> +TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, DISABLED_GCDSourceCancel) {
>> // Make sure the whole ASan report is printed, i.e. that we don't die
>> // o...
2012 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
> Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release?
Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
There seems to be a new regression in current llvm/compiler-rt 3.2 branch.
On 86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing the failure...
[100%] Running all regression tests
lit.py: lit.common.cfg:19: note: using clang: '/sw/src/fink.build/llvm32-3.2-0/llvm-3.2/build/bin/clang'
lit.py: lit.cfg:171: note: using clang: '/sw/src/fink.build/llvm32-3.2-0/llvm-3.2/build/bin/./clang'
FAIL:
2012 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 3.2 regression
...================================================================
>> >> --- lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (revision 170724)
>> >> +++ lib/asan/tests/asan_test.cc (working copy)
>> >> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceEvent
>> >> EXPECT_DEATH(TestGCDSourceEvent(), "Shadow byte and word");
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, GCDSourceCancel) {
>> >> +TEST(AddressSanitizerMac, DISABLED_GCDSourceCancel) {
>> >> // Make sure the whole ASan report is printed...
2017 Nov 08
3
[RFC] ASan: patches to support 32-byte shadow granularity
...nt of low level allocator
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39473
[asan] Avoid assert failure for non-default shadow scale
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39474
[asan] Add full redzone after every stack variable
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39475
[gtest] Increase stack size for child process in EXPECT_DEATH implementation
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39771
[asan] Add lit feature for custom shadow scale
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39772
[asan] Port tests to shadow scale of 5
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39773
[asan] Disable unsupported tests for custom shadow scale
https://reviews.l...
2017 Oct 31
1
[RFC] ASan: patches to support 32-byte shadow granularity
+ more asan folks, please CC them to the code reviews.
Also please make sure llvm-commits is CC-ed (cfe-commits for clang changes)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Walter Lee <waltl at google.com> wrote:
> I've prepared a preliminary set of patches that makes ASan work with
> 32-byte shadow granularity, and I would like to get some feedback on
> those patches as well as my