search for: expasi

Hi, I am trying to submit a form to the EXPASY protscale server ( http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protscale.html). I am using the RCurl package and the postForm function available in it. I have extracted the variables for the form from the HTML source page. According to the syntax of postForm, I just need to mention the url and assign values to the input mentioned in the HTML code. The code that I am

Hi, I am trying to submit a form to the EXPASY protscale server ( http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protscale.html). I am using the RCurl package and the postForm function available in it. I have extracted the variables for the form from the HTML source page. According to the syntax of postForm, I just need to mention the url and assign values to the input mentioned in the HTML code. The code that I am

Hi, How to mark points on x axis of a graph keeping x axis as constant and changing y from y1 to y2 respectively. I want to highlight the area from y1 to y2. Any suggestions Thank you Jeet [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R users, pROC is a package to compare, visualize, and smooth receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The package provides the following features: * Partial or full area under the curve (AUC) computation * Comparison of two ROC curves (curves and AUC) * Calculating and plotting confidence intervals * Smoothing of the ROC curve * Coordinates extraction ('coords' function).

Dear R users, pROC is a package to compare, visualize, and smooth receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The package provides the following features: * Partial or full area under the curve (AUC) computation * Comparison of two ROC curves (curves and AUC) * Calculating and plotting confidence intervals * Smoothing of the ROC curve * Coordinates extraction ('coords' function).

On 30 November 2016 at 05:08, Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > - Is there a preference between the two options provided above? > - Any other alternatives we should consider? > - Which parts of which options do you prefer, and is there a synthesis of either of those options that appeals to you? Hi Dean, I haven't followed the XRay project

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:26 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 November 2016 at 05:08, Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > - Is there a preference between the two options provided above? > > - Any other alternatives we should consider? > > - Which parts of which options do you prefer, and is there

Hi llvm-dev, Recently, we've committed the beginnings of the llvm-xray [0] tool which allows for conveniently working with both XRay-instrumented libraries as well as XRay trace/log files. In the course of the review for the conversion tool [1] which turns a binary/raw XRay log file into YAML for human consumption purposes, a question arose as to how we intend to allow users to develop tools