Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "expandintres_mul".
2017 Oct 07
2
Bug 20871 -- is there a fix or work around?
...+ setLibcallName(RTLIB::MUL_I128, nullptr);
}
// Combine sin / cos into one node or libcall if possible.
if (Subtarget.hasSinCos()) {
setLibcallName(RTLIB::SINCOS_F32, "sincosf");
This will make the Legalizer choose the brute force approach below:
void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_MUL(SDNode *N,
SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi) {
...
if (LC == RTLIB::UNKNOWN_LIBCALL || !TLI.getLibcallName(LC)) {
// We'll expand the multiplication by brute force because we have no other
// options. This is a trivially-generalized version of...
2017 Oct 05
3
Bug 20871 -- is there a fix or work around?
Looks like I have run into the same issue reported in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20871
Is there a fix or work-around for it? The bug report seems to be still open.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171005/46c1282d/attachment.html>