search for: exend

I have some common class methods in a module ''active_record_additions'' that I load into a class by Activity by using extend ActiveRecordAdditions The Activity class uses nested_attributes_for with a reject_if method saved in the module ''active_record_additions'' The problem is that the class methods in ''active_record_additions'' works when I

...+0000 [klibc] dash: eval: Only restore exit status on exit/return [ dash commit 62cf6955f8abe875752d7163f6f3adbc7e49ebae ] We unconditionally restore the saved status in exitreset, which is incorrect as we only want to do it for exitcmd and returncmd. This patch fixes the problem by introducing EXEND. Reported-by: Martijn Dekker <martijn at inlv.org> Fixes: da30b4b78769 ("[BUILTIN] Exit without arguments in a trap...") Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> --- usr/dash/error.h | 3 ++- usr/...

Hi, For those linux and gedit users, here I have some improvements: Smart Indent Syntax Color Improved Extract Partials, and some more plugins http://alexandredasilva.wordpress.com/gmate and http://alexandredasilva.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/exended-ruby-syntax/ att --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe fr...

Ok, try this. Gif the pc a uid and check again. If it works then, its a share or security right. Gpupdate /force works because at that point you "user"/user has a uid and gid. The error occurs at start up because the COMPUTERNAME$ doent have access to that gpt.ini. Resetting sysvol in that case doent help because the right on the gpt.ini is set by the group you assigned to the

...ab, effective settings, At objecttype, deselect all, select computer. Search for : COMPUTERNAME$ It should resolve to your computer. Klik ok, now check the security settings again here. Must have at least : Traverse Folder / Execute file. List folder/ Read Data Read Attributes. Read Exended Attributes. Read permissions.     > wbinfo -i COMPUTERNAME$ & wbinfo -r COMPUTERNAME$ correctly returns him > as member of domain computers (with proper gid) and a custom group to > which it was added When thats ok, keep it as is now, looks good.   After checking you righ...

Hi, I've recently moved our student fileserver from a Solaris 10 server that was using UFS filesytems to a new Sun Cluster. As part of the move I decided to employ ZFS for the filesystem so that I could take advantage of some of ZFS's features. However, it now seems that windows does not report the amount of space that the user is actually using, or the amount of quota left,

hi! I apologize in advance if this is a newbie dumm question, but I really can't figure it ou. I have lists of sumeric and character data on some URLs, which look like this: <photo id="5876248819" owner="13716719 at N04" secret="faf9bb7f52" server="5264" farm="6" title="our rose garden" ispublic="1"

...ld resolve to your computer. > > > > Klik ok, now check the security settings again here. > > > > Must have at least : > > > > Traverse Folder / Execute file. > > > > List folder/ Read Data > > > > Read Attributes. > > > > Read Exended Attributes. > > > > Read permissions. > > > > > > > > Run : > > > > DEL /S /F /Q "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Application Data\Microsoft\Group > Policy\History\*.*" > > > > gpupdate /force > > This works (as usual) > > &...

...with zip archive formats , office formats , document formats.Possibly extended to secondary objectives like media format basically to index metadata and to 3d and 2 d files as those too would contain metadatas.If all the above does get completed in time the next posssible options would be to to exend the indexing to programming languages and repositories.Though that would require tinkering with other componenets. C:Do you have any preliminary findings or results which suggest that your approach is possible and likely to succeed? The approach was suggested in the ideas page and it seems perfe...

Hi Everyone, I am going to get a storage server which will be connected to my Xen hosts via iSCSI/Ethernet. I wish to use LVM for the DomU disks. The storage server will have a RAID10 array, and 2 Xen hosts will connect to this (Each will have a 50% share of the RAID10 array, space wise). What is the best way to go about this? Should I: a) Split the RAID10 array into 2 partition on the