Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "exec_is".
Did you mean:
exec_ats
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
...lman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130727/ff57e511/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
name exec_was exec_is exec_diff
------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------------
Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt 1.4634 0.684 -53.259532595326
Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sh 0.0199 0.0128 -35.678391959799
Benchmarks/mediabenc...
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got
chance to list a detailed pass order
for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations.
This is wish-list in our mind:
pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or
just inline tiny func), get rid of
all loop xforms...
post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only