Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "excluded_below".
2008 Mar 10
2
Do we need excluded_below?
It strikes me that the excluded_below mechanism at the beginning of
recv_generator is useless from a security perspective. When a client
pushes a daemon-excluded directory, the excluded_below mechanism causes
the pushed contents of the directory to be skipped as well as the
directory itself. However, the client can just as easily pus...
2007 Feb 25
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4413] New: Rsync skips too many files after failing to create a directory
...y in the incremental file-list building
(rsync tried to access src/src instead of src):
$ ~/rsync/rsync/rsync -i -a --relative --no-implied-dirs src/./a src/./b/file
dest/
rsync: link_stat "/home/matt/test/missing-below/src/src/./b/file" failed: No
such file or directory (2)
I think the excluded_below mechanism for daemon filters has the same problem as
missing_below.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2008 Mar 17
0
[PATCH] Attempt to rewrite the description of the filter parameters in rsyncd.conf.yo.
- Collect material that applies to all daemon filters in the documentation of
the "filter" parameter, and make it more complete and coherent.
- Amplify the recommendation to exclude entire subtrees properly since the
excluded_below check is easy to circumvent and I have proposed removing it
altogether.
- The `Only one "X" parameter can apply to a given module' wording is meant to
avoid misleading people to think that they can't have different parameters for
different modules.
---
I'm hoping everyt...