Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "exception_assertions".
2008 Dec 28
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...h more lightweight, no comparison there. I know that llvm is
> not very good with exceptions, but should a test case system support that?
>
GTest allows testing for exceptions, it just doesn't require them to work
properly:
http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/GoogleTestAdvancedGuide#Exception_Assertions
> Sample usage of GTest:
> http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/browse/trunk/samples/sample5_unittest.cc
> GTest-specific LOC besides the #include statement: 0.
>
> I think it links to a library as well.
>
Yes, that's true -- just about any unittesting library will hav...
2008 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
> 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a
> different test suite?
> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar
> with that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it
> just that someone makes a patch for
2008 Dec 28
5
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or
> a different test suite?
> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with that.
> So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just that someone
> makes a patch for it?
>
I looked more into Boost.Test to see what's in