Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "exceeed".
Did you mean:
exceeded
2006 Oct 31
0
4667251 groups command returns number, not name for large group \
Author: satishk
Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate
Revision: 5f797824c5a966a7f5d17c831ad5c47835e706f8
Log message:
4667251 groups command returns number, not name for large group \
5080012 ldap: Roles returns NULL if size of roles exceeeds 1022 characters
Files:
update: usr/src/head/nss_dbdefs.h
2006 Jul 24
1
deparse - width.cutoff
I have a question about "deparse" function in R
What is the reason that "deparse" use an argument like "width.cutoff" ?
Why the maximum cutoff is 500?
I was manipulating an R formula and used "deparse". Since the length of user's formula was greater then 500, my code didnt work.
thanks
Johan
johan Faux <johanfaux@yahoo.com> wrote: I have a
2009 Aug 06
0
No subject
...800, seq 1, length 64
> A couple of extra datapoints to check:
> - What if you assign a different IP to the host (in the same subnet) and
> =C2=A0try external guest to host?
I'm not sure what you mean by external guest. If I change the IP of
the host, nothing changes except the time exceeed messages seen by the
external system have the new IP.
> - Is the card in promisc mode? What if you disable promisc mode?
No, I'm using the physical MAC in the guest to avoid promisc.
> Also, it seems that you have an external bridge that sends your outgoing
> packets back to you. Is...
2009 Aug 06
0
No subject
...800, seq 1, length 64
> A couple of extra datapoints to check:
> - What if you assign a different IP to the host (in the same subnet) and
> =C2=A0try external guest to host?
I'm not sure what you mean by external guest. If I change the IP of
the host, nothing changes except the time exceeed messages seen by the
external system have the new IP.
> - Is the card in promisc mode? What if you disable promisc mode?
No, I'm using the physical MAC in the guest to avoid promisc.
> Also, it seems that you have an external bridge that sends your outgoing
> packets back to you. Is...
2019 Mar 20
2
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 1/9] server: Implement extents/can_extents calls for plugins and filters.
...e_t lo, hi;
> + bool coalesce_below, coalesce_above;
> + struct extent new_extent;
> +
> + /* This might be considered an error, but be flexible for badly
> + * written plugins.
> + */
> + if (length == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Don't allow extents to exceeed the _signed_ 64 bit limit that is
exceed
> + * used in the rest of nbdkit.
> + */
> + if (offset > INT64_MAX ||
> + offset + length < offset ||
> + offset + length > INT64_MAX) {
> + nbdkit_error ("nbdkit_extent_add: "
> +...
2019 Mar 19
0
[PATCH nbdkit 1/9] server: Implement extents/can_extents calls for plugins and filters.
...offset, uint64_t length, uint32_t type)
+{
+ ssize_t lo, hi;
+ bool coalesce_below, coalesce_above;
+ struct extent new_extent;
+
+ /* This might be considered an error, but be flexible for badly
+ * written plugins.
+ */
+ if (length == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Don't allow extents to exceeed the _signed_ 64 bit limit that is
+ * used in the rest of nbdkit.
+ */
+ if (offset > INT64_MAX ||
+ offset + length < offset ||
+ offset + length > INT64_MAX) {
+ nbdkit_error ("nbdkit_extent_add: "
+ "extent cannot exceed signed 64 bit li...
2019 Mar 19
15
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] [mainly for discussion and early review] Implement extents.
I want to post this but mainly for discussion and early review. It's
not safe for these patches to all go upstream yet (because not all
filters have been checked/adjusted), but if any patches were to go
upstream then probably 1 & 2 only are safe.
File, VDDK, memory and data plugins all work, although I have only
done minimal testing on them.
The current tests, such as they are, all