search for: excav

John Rosatti, Excavators, 3D, NASA and Why Should I care? Well, because! There are two definitions for excavator; one is any person engaging in excavation is called an excavator. The second definition of excavator is, of course, the vehicles called excavators, which are sometimes called diggers, trackhoes, fron...

...all, On 5/16/23 20:08, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > Idly browsing the client sources, I guess I could try to add our logic > here[1] and use [2] to gather the battery stats from our UPS and then > decide if this UPS is considered critical or not. But for this, I would > need to dust off/excavate my ancient poor C knowledge ;-). > > I guess I will give this a try unless someone has a brilliant idea and > could save my sanity. I've given it a try now and would like to get some feedback whether this is something worth considering as a PR or if this is too niche for master:...

...roid_MEDIUMRECTANGLE_300x250_IAB7 7 Nights at Pizza House - 2 7 Nights at Pizza House 3D com.zombodroid com.zombodroid.battle com.zombodroid.memegenerator com.zone.talking.pet com.zone.yinshidaquan Disney Kingdom Disney Kingdom_Android Evite Evite Invitations Evite IOS_Evite_IOS_320x50 Excavator Simulator 3D:Sand Excavator Snow Plow Loader Truck Flippy Knife Flippy Knife - 654567 fliptech.iowafmworld fliptech.serbiafmworld Floor is lava! Floor is lava: Escape Go_Launcher Go_Launcher_Lite myyearbook Android myyearbook.com-MeetMe_Android_300x250_UK hoping to obtain somethi...

...ed on their own UPS queries. Probably doable, but not that nice. Idly browsing the client sources, I guess I could try to add our logic here[1] and use [2] to gather the battery stats from our UPS and then decide if this UPS is considered critical or not. But for this, I would need to dust off/excavate my ancient poor C knowledge ;-). I guess I will give this a try unless someone has a brilliant idea and could save my sanity. Cheers Carsten [1] https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/e3bdc28476700c7396bdde912e5789ccb7ecb1d7/clients/upsmon.c#L925 [2] https://github.com/networkupstoo...

Buenos días: Por favor, ¿alguien puede indicarme si sólo hay que documentar las funciones visibles del paquete?. Además, ¿cómo se consigue que sólo algunas de las funciones estén visibles?. ¿Cómo manejo el namespaces para ello?. Gracias. Eva [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

"Does that help?" No. I am not your private consultant. You need to reply to the list, which I have cc'ed here, not just me. I am still somewhat confused by your specifications, but others may not be. Part of my confusion stems from your failure to provide a reproducible example (see e.g. the posting guide linked below). For example, I cannot tell from your text whether the Abc

....xls/*.wdb/; [admin] writeable =yes guest ok = no path = /home/shares/admin # force group = Domain Users create mode = 770 directory mode = 770 oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes # veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.xls/*.wdb/; [excavate] writeable =yes guest ok = no path = /home/shares/excavate # force group = Domain Users create mode = 770 directory mode = 770 oplocks = false level2 oplocks = false # veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.wdb/; [piling]...

If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that vgather* is slow on all of Excavator, Haswell, Broadwell, and Skylake (client). Therefore, we will not generate it for any of those machines. Even if that's true, we should not define "gatherIsSlow()" as "hasAVX2() && !hasAVX512()". It could break for some hypothetical future processor that manages...

...ption for the users to enable LLVM to generate the gather instructions no matter it is faster or slow. Best, Zhi On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote: > If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that vgather* is slow on all > of Excavator, Haswell, Broadwell, and Skylake (client). Therefore, we will > not generate it for any of those machines. > > Even if that's true, we should not define "gatherIsSlow()" as "hasAVX2() > && !hasAVX512()". It could break for some hypothetical future pro...

Greetings, In order to use solaris's BSM (Basic security module) also called c2 audit, which logs specific kernel calls depending on your audit_control, I would need to use login(1) to log users exec calls and whatnot because Portable OpenSSH does not have <bsm/audit.h> support, now that would mean I would have to enable Uselogin in sshd_config in order for that to work. I am running

...20:08, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > > Idly browsing the client sources, I guess I could try to add our logic > > here[1] and use [2] to gather the battery stats from our UPS and then > > decide if this UPS is considered critical or not. But for this, I would > > need to dust off/excavate my ancient poor C knowledge ;-). > > > > I guess I will give this a try unless someone has a brilliant idea and > > could save my sanity. > > I've given it a try now and would like to get some feedback whether this > is something worth considering as a PR or if thi...

...robably > doable, but not that nice. > > Idly browsing the client sources, I guess I could try to add our logic > here[1] and use [2] to gather the battery stats from our UPS and then > decide if this UPS is considered critical or not. But for this, I would > need to dust off/excavate my ancient poor C knowledge ;-). > > I guess I will give this a try unless someone has a brilliant idea and > could save my sanity. > > Cheers > > Carsten > Take an extra vitamin b1 and start hacking ;o) Seriously, if its that important, do as I did when my last wi...

From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> When NR_CPUS increases the fixmap might need more than the page allocated by head_32.S. This patch introduces the logic to calculate the additional memory that is going to be required by early_ioremap_page_table_range_init: - enough memory to allocate the pte pages needed to cover the fixmap virtual memory range, minus the single

No. Gather operation is slow on AVX2 processors. - Elena From: zhi chen [mailto:zchenhn at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 20:48 To: Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> Cc: Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] how to force

It seems that http://reviews.llvm.org/D15690 only implemented gather/scatter for AVX-512, but not for AVX/AVX2. Is there any plan to enable gather for AVX/2? Thanks. Best, Zhi On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote: > I don't think gather has been enabled for AVX2 as of r261875. > Masked load/store were enabled for AVX with: >