search for: exc_

...can remove without the need to touch > >> anything else, the > >> following can be disabled as long as you disable > a > >> bit of code: > >> - VBR (vbr.c and references to VBR in nb_celp.c) > >> - codebooks for other bit-rates: > >> * all exc_*.c files except exc_10_16_table.c > >> * gain_table.c > >> > >> There might be a few bits more that can be > removed, > >> but I think this > >> summarizes it well. > >> > >> Jean-Marc > >> > > > > > > T...

...'t needed. In > addition to all the > files you can remove without the need to touch > anything else, the > following can be disabled as long as you disable a > bit of code: > - VBR (vbr.c and references to VBR in nb_celp.c) > - codebooks for other bit-rates: > * all exc_*.c files except exc_10_16_table.c > * gain_table.c > > There might be a few bits more that can be removed, > but I think this > summarizes it well. > > Jean-Marc > Thanks, that help a lot. I was able to reduced the library from 522Kb to 296Kb per your suggestions....

Hi Jean-Marc, I have just discovered the post of Vit Kanevsky and I have already sent him a message. I'm currently evaluating the work of stripping stuff on the win32 platform(nicer workflow ;-) and noticed that I could not just leave out the exc_*_table.c files without getting compiler/linker warning, but possibly I made a mistake there. Is my assumption correct that I just need the exc_10_16_table.c for my 6000 bps? Best regards, Tobias -- Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL f?r nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://ds...

> How did you do it without the pragma? I understood that the problem was a mismatch between the the declaration and definition in for some codebooks (exc_*_tables.c). > I saw you added the pragmas to disable the float/double warnings to misc.h > though that header isn't included by the files that generate the warnings. What are the offending files then? BTW, aside from the warnings, does the code compile and work? Jean-Marc --...

Hi, Sorry if this a repost but I want to create the smallest Speex library possible to be put in TI's TMS320 DSP. I'm only interested in one configuration: 5.97 Kbps narrowband. What part of source code can I remove? Currently, when I compiled the version 1.1.12 libspeex.a library with the TI TMS320 and Fixed-Integer options, I get around 522Kb. I would like to reduce it to as small

...tion to all the >> files you can remove without the need to touch >> anything else, the >> following can be disabled as long as you disable a >> bit of code: >> - VBR (vbr.c and references to VBR in nb_celp.c) >> - codebooks for other bit-rates: >> * all exc_*.c files except exc_10_16_table.c >> * gain_table.c >> >> There might be a few bits more that can be removed, >> but I think this >> summarizes it well. >> >> Jean-Marc >> > > > Thanks, that help a lot. I was able to reduced the > libr...

...he file and it still works, then it wasn't needed. In addition to all the files you can remove without the need to touch anything else, the following can be disabled as long as you disable a bit of code: - VBR (vbr.c and references to VBR in nb_celp.c) - codebooks for other bit-rates: * all exc_*.c files except exc_10_16_table.c * gain_table.c There might be a few bits more that can be removed, but I think this summarizes it well. Jean-Marc

Hi everyone, I'm currently looking into using speex in an embedded project using an ST ARM-device (STR9 family) just with internal memory (96kbyte) and no O/S. Does anyone know if the optimizations included in the code for ARMv4 and ARMv5e are appliable to this device? I would also need to strip down libspeex pretty hard to fit into the available memory. I just want to use a fixed bitrate

I did some modifications to address the problems you have. I think I fixed the alignment problem without the pragma you suggested, but I don't have the setup to test it. It's in CVS, so tell me if there are still some problems left. Jean-Marc <p>Le jeu 30/01/2003 à 18:58, Daniel Vogel a écrit : > I just compiled the current code in CVS with VS.NET on Windows and here are

...I can provide ? (wine -debugmsg +all is 2,5 MB and doesn *not* end up with the RtlpWaitForCriticalSection error, but <snip approx.2 MB> Call x11drv.17: LoadOEMResource(00007ff7,00000001) ret=40633dbe fs=02d7 trace:heap:HeapAlloc (40340000,00000002,0000008c): returning 403e75d8 trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 0810d2a8: queue_exception_event( first=1, record={context={flags=00000000,eax=40c01e90,ebx=407bf0e0,ecx=403bdc40,e dx=00000000,esi=40c03eb4,edi=403e75d8,ebp=40c01d9c,eip=407b3cf9,esp=40bf fd80,eflags=00210202,cs=0023,ds=002b,es=002b,fs=02d7,gs=02f7,dr0=000000...