search for: exc2

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 19:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > jean-marc: i think we can remove spx_sig_t *orig. > > but am not sure about exc2Buf. is it for extension? > > orig is already removed in SVN (which you should probably use). As for > exc2, it can be removed, but I'm not sure if you can just use exc > instead (maybe yes). > when removing "spx_sig_t *orig;" in the encoder, the stack usage went from...

On 01/13/2010 02:07 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dustin, the code generators do not support unwind, only the > interpreter does. Ah, the secret is not to even try to frob the gnorts. Manual unwinding, here I come. :-( I was going to say the interpreter doesn't either, but then I recalled it JITs when it can. I don't know how to call into libc from the interpreter to test that.

hi, jean-marc: i think we can remove spx_sig_t *orig. but am not sure about exc2Buf. is it for extension? rgds, tk On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:42:38 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > I looked at the code I think there are still places where you can reduce > memory. For example, I think bufSize can be reduced to around 400...

Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: >On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 19:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > >>>jean-marc: i think we can remove spx_sig_t *orig. >>>but am not sure about exc2Buf. is it for extension? >>> >>> >>orig is already removed in SVN (which you should probably use). As for >>exc2, it can be removed, but I'm not sure if you can just use exc >>instead (maybe yes). >> >> >> >when removing "s...

On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 04:31 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi, > > I just checked in some changes that remove some unnecessary buffers > (exc2 and buf2) and that reduce other buffers to the minimum. That > should save 7800 bytes for the encoder. > > Jean-Marc > thanks, I have merged the diff in $ svn merge-r 8996:8997 http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex to my codebase. it works as expected, nb_celp.c stacksize is reduced to...