Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5093 matches for "examiners".
Did you mean:
examiner
2007 May 04
1
subset
hello,
> subset(swiss, Agriculture > 60 & Examination != c(14,16), select = c(Agriculture,Examination,Catholic))
Agriculture Examination Catholic
Broye 70.2 16 3.30
Glane 67.8 14 4.20
Aigle 62.0 21 5.16
Avenches 60.7 19 5.23
Cossonay 69.3 22 5.62
2009 Oct 15
2
plotting/examining residuals of a mixed generalised linear model
Dear R users,
I'm hoping that more experienced users will be able to assist me in
examining the model fit of a mixed generalised linear model. The example
using the data 'bacteria' within the MASS package will hopefully illustrate
what I would like to acheive;
library(MASS)
library(nlme)
attach(bacteria) # y being output and the trt - treatment group being an
explanatory variable.
2006 May 23
3
ignoring file times - but still examining content
Hello.
I would like to transfer files which have changed on another box.
The rsync man page says:
--size-only
..This is useful when starting to use rsync after using another mirroring system which may not preserve timestamps exactly..
Which is my situation.
My problem is that the size-only switch (clearly) ignores files with different content, but that have the same size.
I'd like to
2018 Jan 04
4
Bug in dovecot 2.3 virtual plugin
Hi!
Is this a bug according to the other one?
When i try to open a real or virtual mailbox, i often (not on every
mailbox) get this error-message:
J?n 04 11:03:32 aldebaran dovecot[24534]:
imap(jakob)<24705><Ug/EcfBhSrDAqAAO>: Panic: Leaked view for index
/var/lib/dovecot/db/indexes/Maildir/jakob/INBOX/dovecot.index: Opened
in index-storage.c:336
J?n 04 11:03:32 aldebaran
2013 Apr 29
1
SELECT/EXAMINE don't report URLMECH
In dovecot-2.2.1 neither the SELECT nor the EXAMINE commands include an untagged URLMECH reply. (Note, this is not the one mandated by the RESETKEY command.)
AFAICT RFC 4467 does not require an URLMECH reply to SELECT or EXAMINE but without it clients have no way of knowing about authorization mechanisms other than INTERNAL. Now I know dovecot-2.2 supports only the INTERNAL mechanism at present
2010 Sep 01
2
Broken SELECT ""/EXAMINE ""
a EXAMINE INBOX
[...]
a OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed.
a EXAMINE ""
a NO Empty mailbox name.
[Should be in authenticated mode with no active mailbox. But...]
a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY)
* STATUS "INBOX" (UIDVALIDITY 1255685337)
a OK [CLIENTBUG] Status on selected mailbox completed.
a UNSELECT
a OK Unselect completed.
a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY)
* STATUS "INBOX"
2008 Jul 19
0
How to examine crash dump of Centos Kernel
Hi,
I have been able to successfully use crash to examine a crash dump of
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 using the following command:
crash /boot/System.map-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE/vmlinux ./vmcore
I then installed the package kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 and rebooted
with that (there is no PAE debugging kernels in the repository). I
reproduced my
2014 Apr 26
1
Assert Crash with HG 49e9d9743f6e
New crash most likely related to Virtual plugin again:
Apr 26 07:40:40 spectre dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 1836 (mailbox_transaction_begin): assertion failed: (box->opened)
Apr 26 07:40:40 spectre dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x6bc0f) [0x7fdfce48ac0f] ->
2010 Mar 26
2
INBOX. namespace
I am trying to configure dovecot-1.2.11 to have the same IMAP namespacing as
courier-imap as per http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier, but failing
badly.
I have a test maildir with INBOX and folder 'junk'. Without fiddling with
namespaces, this works fine: there are 91 msgs in INBOX and 2 in junk.
a namespace
* NAMESPACE (("" ".")) NIL NIL
a OK Namespace
2010 Sep 16
1
Survival Analysis Daily Time-Varying Covariate but Event Time Unknown
Help!
I am unsure if I can analyze data from the following experiment.
Fish were placed in a tank at (t=0)
Measurements of Carbon Dioxide were taken each day for 120 days (t=0,...120)
A few fish were then randomly pulled out of the tank at different days,
killed and examined for the presence of a disease
T= time of examination in days from start (i.e. 85th day), E = 0/1 for
nonevent/event
My
2017 Sep 07
0
imapc bug (signal 6)
Running 2.3.0~alpha0-1~auto+1045, basically as a proxy between MUA and
Exchange (IMAP):
Sep 7 16:10:32 mproxy dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<holtgrem>, method=PLAIN, rip=172.16.128.8, lip=141.42.206.11, mpid=61031, TLS, session=<fp3JBZpYop+sEIAI>
Sep 7 16:10:32 mproxy dovecot: imap(holtgrem)<fp3JBZpYop+sEIAI>: imapc(exchange-imap.charite.de:993): Connected to
2011 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] examine dominating relationships between basic blocks
I am building code which needs to examine dominating relationships
between Basic Blocks.
I searched the Programming Guide
(http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#common), it mentioned
briefly that such details will be covered in the future.
So, I am tuning to the list and ask.
Say, I have BasicBlock * a, *b, and need to know whether a DOM b, (a
DOMi b, a DOMp b, a PostDOM b), etc.
How
2008 Oct 24
1
Bug in QRESYNC SELECT/EXAMINE behavior
RFC 5162 [3.1] states that a QRESYNC should return all changes in a
SELECT/EXAMINE since the given modseq. In the following case, it
looks like there is an off-by-1 error somewhere:
C: A64 SELECT "TestMailboxTest" (QRESYNC (1224531494 6 1,3:5))
[MMS: MODSEQ given is 6]
S: * OK [CLOSED]
S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged
2012 Jan 18
0
examine grouped data lmList
Dear community,
I'm trying to examine my grouped data following page 6
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Fox-Companion/appendix-mixed-models.pdf.
I'm trying lmList this way:
model.list <- lmList(log(v.dep) ~ log(v2) +log(v4) + v3 | v5, subset =
v6=0, data=data)
and obtain this error message: In Ops.factor(v4, v4) : | not meaningful for
factors
My original model is
2007 May 14
2
lmer function
Does anyone know if the lmer function of lme4 works fine for unbalanced designs? I have the examination results of 1000 pupils on three subjects, one score every term. So, I have three scores for English (one for every term), three scores for maths etc. However, not everybody was examined in maths, not everybody was examined in English etc, but everybody was in effect examined on four subjects. I
2018 Jan 05
4
Bug in dovecot 2.3 virtual plugin
This is a different bug, and I suspect it might be caused by virtual
plugin. We'll look into it.
Aki
On 04.01.2018 23:41, Jakob Sch?rz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is very strange...
> This error affects only one mailaccount, and it happend not yesterday.
> The file
>
> /var/lib/dovecot/db/indexes/Maildir/jakob/INBOX/dovecot.index
>
> which hat "Panic: Leaked view
2019 Sep 19
5
Re: [PATCH nbdkit v3 2/3] Add new retry filter.
On 9/19/19 10:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This filter can be used to transparently reopen/retry when a plugin
> fails. The connection is closed and reopened which for most plugins
> causes them to attempt to reconnect to their source.
>
> For example if doing a long or slow SSH copy:
>
> nbdkit -U - ssh host=remote /var/tmp/test.iso \
> --run 'qemu-img
2009 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] Bug in LiveIntervals? Please Examine
On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:57 AM, David Greene wrote:
> In LiveIntervals::processImplicitDefs() we have this:
>
> for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator UI = mri_->use_begin(Reg),
> UE = mri_->use_end(); UI != UE; ) {
> MachineOperand &RMO = UI.getOperand();
> MachineInstr *RMI = &*UI;
> ++UI;
> MachineBasicBlock *RMBB
2010 May 25
0
Examining a dump from /opt/xensource/libexec/dumpcore
Hey All,
I have a dump of a VM using /opt/xensource/libexec/dumpcore on XS5.5
Does anyone know what tools can be used to examine the resultant dump?
Regards
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2013 Feb 05
1
lmer - BLUP prediction intervals
Dear all
I have a model that looks like this:
m1 <- lmer(Difference ~ 1+ (1|Examiner) + (1|Item), data=englisho.data)
I know it is not possible to estimate random effects but one can
obtain BLUPs of the conditional modes with
re1 <- ranef(m1, postVar=T)
And then dotplot(re1) for the examiner and item levels gives me a nice
prediction interval. But I would like to have the prediction