search for: examine

hello, > subset(swiss, Agriculture > 60 & Examination != c(14,16), select = c(Agriculture,Examination,Catholic)) Agriculture Examination Catholic Broye 70.2 16 3.30 Glane 67.8 14 4.20 Aigle 62.0 21 5.16 Avenches 60.7 19 5.23 Cossonay 69.3 22 5.62

...ria$y<-1*(bacteria$y=="y") # to make readable in lmer table(bacteria$y,bacteria$trt) hs <- groupedData(y~trt|ID,outer=~trt,data=bacteria) # I don't think this is really necessary model <- lmer(y ~ trt + (week|ID),family=binomial,data=hs) summary(model) Here I would like to examine the fit of the variable trt by examining the residuals. In lm (using lme in "the R book, p. 657"), one would be able to use plot(model,trt~resid(.)) However it doesn't work. If some one would explain why, that would be great. I've come across the package "zelig", whic...

...eful when starting to use rsync after using another mirroring system which may not preserve timestamps exactly.. Which is my situation. My problem is that the size-only switch (clearly) ignores files with different content, but that have the same size. I'd like to ignore timestamps but still examine content. How can I do that?

...ot/lib20_virtual_plugin.so(virtual_storage_sync_init+0x114d) [0x7f47d0dd6a4d] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync_init+0x4d) [0x7f47d5b6b05d] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync+0x37) [0x7f47d5b6b117] -> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](cmd_select_full+0x171) [0x555d195a91a1] -> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](command_exec+0x64) [0x555d195b0ca4] -> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](+0x1b0b2) [0x555d195af0b2] -> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](+0x1b13c) [0x555d195af13c] -> dovecot/imap [jako...

In dovecot-2.2.1 neither the SELECT nor the EXAMINE commands include an untagged URLMECH reply. (Note, this is not the one mandated by the RESETKEY command.) AFAICT RFC 4467 does not require an URLMECH reply to SELECT or EXAMINE but without it clients have no way of knowing about authorization mechanisms other than INTERNAL. Now I know dovecot-2....

a EXAMINE INBOX [...] a OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. a EXAMINE "" a NO Empty mailbox name. [Should be in authenticated mode with no active mailbox. But...] a STATUS INBOX (UIDVALIDITY) * STATUS "INBOX" (UIDVALIDITY 1255685337) a OK [CLIENTBUG] Status on selected mailbox completed. a...

Hi, I have been able to successfully use crash to examine a crash dump of kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 using the following command: crash /boot/System.map-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE/vmlinux ./vmcore I then installed the package kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 and rebooted with that (there is no PAE debugging kern...

...es/lib20_virtual_plugin.so(virtual_storage_sync_init+0x564) [0x7fdfccc2eb84] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync_init+0x33) [0x7fdfce776e53] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync+0x27) [0x7fdfce776f77] -> dovecot/imap [tlx at leuxner.net 95.223.79.50 EXAMINE](cmd_select_full+0x173) [0x412c13] -> dovecot/imap [tlx at leuxner.net 95.223.79.50 EXAMINE](command_exec+0x3c) [0x41839c] -> dovecot/imap [tlx at leuxner.net 95.223.79.50 EXAMINE]() [0x417400] -> dovecot/imap [tlx at leuxner.net 95.223.79.50 EXAMINE]() [0x4174ba] -> dovecot/imap [tlx a...

...iki.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier, but failing badly. I have a test maildir with INBOX and folder 'junk'. Without fiddling with namespaces, this works fine: there are 91 msgs in INBOX and 2 in junk. a namespace * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) NIL NIL a OK Namespace completed. a examine INBOX ... * 91 EXISTS ... a OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. a examine junk ... * 2 EXISTS ... a OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. Now I make the following addition to dovecot.conf: namespace private { separator = . prefix = INBOX. inbox = yes hidden = no } After this the inbox appear...

Help! I am unsure if I can analyze data from the following experiment. Fish were placed in a tank at (t=0) Measurements of Carbon Dioxide were taken each day for 120 days (t=0,...120) A few fish were then randomly pulled out of the tank at different days, killed and examined for the presence of a disease T= time of examination in days from start (i.e. 85th day), E = 0/1 for nonevent/event My problem has been linking all the Carbon Dioxide measurements up to the day of examination and trying to create a survival object. I have considered interval censoring with right...

...59c091786] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xabadc) [0x7f059c091adc] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync_deinit+0x35) [0x7f059c02f925] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync+0x4b) [0x7f059c0315bb] -> dovecot/imap [holtgrem 172.16.128.8 EXAMINE](cmd_select_full+0x170) [0x55fac9ae2b60] -> dovecot/imap [holtgrem 172.16.128.8 EXAMINE](command_exec+0x5c) [0x55fac9aea39c] -> dovecot/imap [holtgrem 172.16.128.8 EXAMINE](+0x1b822) [0x55fac9ae8822] -> dovecot/imap [holtgrem 172.16.128.8 EXAMINE](+0x1b8ac) [0x55fac9ae88ac] -> dovecot/i...

I am building code which needs to examine dominating relationships between Basic Blocks. I searched the Programming Guide (http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#common), it mentioned briefly that such details will be covered in the future. So, I am tuning to the list and ask. Say, I have BasicBlock * a, *b, and need to know whet...

RFC 5162 [3.1] states that a QRESYNC should return all changes in a SELECT/EXAMINE since the given modseq. In the following case, it looks like there is an off-by-1 error somewhere: C: A64 SELECT "TestMailboxTest" (QRESYNC (1224531494 6 1,3:5)) [MMS: MODSEQ given is 6] S: * OK [CLOSED] S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\A...

Dear community, I'm trying to examine my grouped data following page 6 http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Fox-Companion/appendix-mixed-models.pdf. I'm trying lmList this way: model.list <- lmList(log(v.dep) ~ log(v2) +log(v4) + v3 | v5, subset = v6=0, data=data) and obtain this error message: In Ops.factor(v4, v4) :...

Does anyone know if the lmer function of lme4 works fine for unbalanced designs? I have the examination results of 1000 pupils on three subjects, one score every term. So, I have three scores for English (one for every term), three scores for maths etc. However, not everybody was examined in maths, not everybody was examined in English etc, but everybody was in effect examined on four subjects. I also have information abouit the school. Would this model hive the right results for the variance components? mod_3_f <- lmer(SCORE ~ GENDER + (1 |ID ) + (1 | TERM) + (1 | SUBJECT) ,...

...x114d) >> [0x7f47d0dd6a4d] -> >> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync_init+0x4d) >> [0x7f47d5b6b05d] -> >> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_sync+0x37) >> [0x7f47d5b6b117] -> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 >> EXAMINE](cmd_select_full+0x171) [0x555d195a91a1] -> dovecot/imap [jakob >> 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](command_exec+0x64) [0x555d195b0ca4] -> >> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](+0x1b0b2) [0x555d195af0b2] -> >> dovecot/imap [jakob 192.168.0.14 EXAMINE](+0x1b13c) [0x555d195af13...

On 9/19/19 10:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This filter can be used to transparently reopen/retry when a plugin > fails. The connection is closed and reopened which for most plugins > causes them to attempt to reconnect to their source. > > For example if doing a long or slow SSH copy: > > nbdkit -U - ssh host=remote /var/tmp/test.iso \ > --run 'qemu-img

On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:57 AM, David Greene wrote: > In LiveIntervals::processImplicitDefs() we have this: > > for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator UI = mri_->use_begin(Reg), > UE = mri_->use_end(); UI != UE; ) { > MachineOperand &RMO = UI.getOperand(); > MachineInstr *RMI = &*UI; > ++UI; > MachineBasicBlock *RMBB

Hey All, I have a dump of a VM using /opt/xensource/libexec/dumpcore on XS5.5 Does anyone know what tools can be used to examine the resultant dump? Regards David _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Dear all I have a model that looks like this: m1 <- lmer(Difference ~ 1+ (1|Examiner) + (1|Item), data=englisho.data) I know it is not possible to estimate random effects but one can obtain BLUPs of the conditional modes with re1 <- ranef(m1, postVar=T) And then dotplot(re1) for the examiner and item levels gives me a nice prediction interval. But I would like to have the pr...