search for: examapl

Hi ... I have squid integrated with OpenLdap . I need create an Ou and a lot of groups but my Openldap is integrated with Samba too. How I could create OUs in enviroment integrated ? For examaple, I create users using smbldap-tools but this tool doesn?t create Ou. Thanks . -- Bruno Steven - Administrador de sistemas. LPIC-1 - LPI ID: lpi000119659 / Code: p2e4wz47e4 https://www.lpi.org/caf/Xamman/certification MCP-Windows 2003 - TranscriptID: 793804 / Access Code: 080089100 https://mc...

...) describe what steps (& how this patch relates) are planned to get to (2) > > My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of this: Usually > bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the same time, and > designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, which added an > explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to have been an > oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an accurate > representation/statement?) > More or less: it was not an oversight. The summaries are not really part of the IR, it is m...

...elates) are planned to get to >>> (2) >>> >>> My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of this: >>> Usually bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the same >>> time, and designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, >>> which added an explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to >>> have been an oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an >>> accurate representation/statement?) >>> >> >> More or less: it was not an oversight. &gt...

I have a very simple problem and am completely missing the solution. I have two character variables (character ID's from two datasets) Data set 'b' is data set 'a' with one more subject added. How do I find out which is the added subject? I have tried duplicated and unique without much success. I can find all the duplicated ID's but how do I extract the new

...gt;> to (2) >>>>> >>>>> My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of this: >>>>> Usually bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the same >>>>> time, and designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, >>>>> which added an explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to >>>>> have been an oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an >>>>> accurate representation/statement?) >>>>> >>>> >>&gt...

...gt;> to (2) >>>>> >>>>> My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of this: >>>>> Usually bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the same >>>>> time, and designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, >>>>> which added an explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to >>>>> have been an oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an >>>>> accurate representation/statement?) >>>>> >>>> >>&gt...

Hey all, Below is the proposed format for the dump of the ThinLTO module summary in the llvm-dis utility: > ../build/bin/llvm-dis t.o && cat t.o.ll ; ModuleID = '2.o' source_filename = "2.ll" target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @X = constant i32 42, section "foo", align

...gt;>> >>>>>>> My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of this: >>>>>>> Usually bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the same >>>>>>> time, and designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, >>>>>>> which added an explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to >>>>>>> have been an oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an >>>>>>> accurate representation/statement?) >>>>>>&...

...gt;>> >>>>>>> My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of this: >>>>>>> Usually bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the same >>>>>>> time, and designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, >>>>>>> which added an explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to >>>>>>> have been an oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an >>>>>>> accurate representation/statement?) >>>>>>&...

...>> My naive thoughts, not being intimately familiar with any of >>>>>>>>>>> this: Usually bitcode and textual IR support go in together or around the >>>>>>>>>>> same time, and designed that way from the start (take r211920 for examaple, >>>>>>>>>>> which added an explicit representation of COMDATs to the IR). This seems to >>>>>>>>>>> have been an oversight in the implementation of IR summaries (is that an >>>>>>>>>>> accurate repr...