search for: exageration

Howdy, Some ext2/3 benchmarks on a IBM-DPTA-372050 connected to k7 650MHz. The same partition was used on all tests roughly with the same disk usage. bonnie on ext2: -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU

Hi, I have just discovered (a year after it was implemented) a possibly undocumented incompatability between IAX in Asterisk 1.4 and any version of Asterisk pre-March 2008. It seems an AST_CONTROL_SRCUPDATE frame type was added (in March '08), but no mechanism to negotiate whether it can be sent to the remote end, so if a "new" IAX endpoint sends it, and the remote end ignores it,

>If you ***look at the code*** for arima you will see that ``%+%'' is >defined >in terms of a call to ``.Call()'' which calls ``R_TSconv''. So >apparently >R_TSconv is a C or Fortran function or subroutine in a ``shared >object library'' >or dll upon which arima depends. Hence to do anything with it you'll >need to get >that shared

Hello all, we are using rsync to produce a replica of our filesystem. it's very important for us to be sure that the files replicated on the remote backup host are left in a consistent state as we may need to boot services from those files (configs, logs, etc)! right now we use a 'greedy approach'... we stop all important services (dhcpd, squid, sendmail, etc) just to minimize the

...ods are slow and doesn't make good use of multiprocessor > systems. > > >From now on it is possible to build LLVM+Clang with the usual cmake > method but using Ninja, an ultra-fast tool that knows how to take > advantage of the availabe execution threads. Ultra-fast is no > exageration: with a warm cache, a no-op build of LLVM is done in less > than half a second. > > Rigth now Ninja/VS support is activated on a cmake experimental build, > with strong possibilities of making its way into the next official > release. For now, you need to build the patched cmake+ninj...

...39;t make good use of multiprocessor >> systems. >> >> >From now on it is possible to build LLVM+Clang with the usual cmake >> method but using Ninja, an ultra-fast tool that knows how to take >> advantage of the availabe execution threads. Ultra-fast is no >> exageration: with a warm cache, a no-op build of LLVM is done in less >> than half a second. >> >> Rigth now Ninja/VS support is activated on a cmake experimental build, >> with strong possibilities of making its way into the next official >> release. For now, you need to build th...

Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. Concerning your examples: * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are best associated with a package. I think it changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developers willing to maintain it and be reactive regarding fea...

...in because the available methods are slow and doesn't make good use of multiprocessor systems. >From now on it is possible to build LLVM+Clang with the usual cmake method but using Ninja, an ultra-fast tool that knows how to take advantage of the availabe execution threads. Ultra-fast is no exageration: with a warm cache, a no-op build of LLVM is done in less than half a second. Rigth now Ninja/VS support is activated on a cmake experimental build, with strong possibilities of making its way into the next official release. For now, you need to build the patched cmake+ninja yourselves or download...

Looking at the html generated help pages for a package I'm working on, I noticed a couple of things that looked a little funny. I suspect they are general features of the html for R (I don't usually look at it). First is a problem of vertical alignment in tables. The first column consistently aligned vertically *below* the alignment line of the bottom line of the second column. This was

Dear members of the list, I''m a beginner in R and I''m having some trouble with: "Error in optim(init[mask], armafn, method = "BFGS", hessian = TRUE, control = optim.control, : non-finite finite-difference value [8]" when running "arima". I''ve seen that some people have come accross the same problem:

Hi, I misunderstand the definition of Canberra distance in R. On Internet and in function description pages of dist() from stats and Dist() from amap, Canberra distance between vectors x and y, d(x,y), is : d(x,y) = sum(abs(x-y)/(x+y)) But in use, through simple examples, we find that the formula is : d(x,y) = (NZ + 1)/NZ * sum(abs(x-y)/(x+y)) with NZ = nb of pairs of coordinates that are

...being that it only makes sense for them to go into R itself if > doing so fixes an issue that cna't be fixed with them in package space. > > Best, > ~G > > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 5:26 AM Ant F <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. >> >> Concerning your examples: >> >> * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are >> best associated with a package. I think it >> changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developers...

...being that it only makes sense for them to go into R itself if > doing so fixes an issue that cna't be fixed with them in package space. > > Best, > ~G > > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 5:26 AM Ant F <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. >> >> Concerning your examples: >> >> * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are >> best associated with a package. I think it >> changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developer...

On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 17:15, Hugh Marera <hugh.marera at gmail.com> wrote: > > How is your argument different to, say, "Should dplyr or data.table be > part of base R as they are the most popular data science packages and they > are used by a large number of users?" Two packages with many features, dozens of functions and under heavy development to fix bugs, add new

...being fine in packages. A summary of my reasoning being that it only makes sense for them to go into R itself if doing so fixes an issue that cna't be fixed with them in package space. Best, ~G On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 5:26 AM Ant F <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. > > Concerning your examples: > > * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are > best associated with a package. I think it > changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developers > willing to maintain...

Hi, This mail is a request for vendors who have integrated OpenSSH into their products or devices to step up and provide some financial assistance back to the project. Please note that this request is intended for *vendors* - our individual userbase already helps us in every appropriate way. You may have noticed a similar request for OpenSSH/OpenBSD funding made by Marco Peereboom in this last

Hi, This mail is a request for vendors who have integrated OpenSSH into their products or devices to step up and provide some financial assistance back to the project. Please note that this request is intended for *vendors* - our individual userbase already helps us in every appropriate way. You may have noticed a similar request for OpenSSH/OpenBSD funding made by Marco Peereboom in this last

Dear Carlos and Kjetil, Thanks for your answer. >I do not think that is the way to go. If you believe that your algorithm >is better than the existing one, talk to the author of the package and >discuss the improvement. The whole community will benefit. I should be able to *easily* modify it and test it first! >Copy the existing function into a new file, edit it and load it via

...them to go into R itself if >> doing so fixes an issue that cna't be fixed with them in package space. >> >> Best, >> ~G >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 5:26 AM Ant F <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. >>> >>> Concerning your examples: >>> >>> * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are >>> best associated with a package. I think it >>> changed a lot with time and can still change, and w...

...ning being that it only makes sense for them to go into R itself if > doing so fixes an issue that cna't be fixed with them in package space. > > Best, > ~G > > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 5:26 AM Ant F <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. > > > > Concerning your examples: > > > > * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are > > best associated with a package. I think it > > changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great >...