search for: exactcod

...; - Configure with the environment variables CC=/path/to/clang CXX=/path/to/clang++, which works with either autoconf configure or CMake cmake/ccmake. > > - Build LLVM and Clang as normal. > > - Report your experiences to help us improve Clang! > > - Doug -- René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin http://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de

I can't switch to clang on my project until it can handle boost headers. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Rene Rebe <rene at exactcode.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > >> Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, >> >> We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! >> >> Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as yo...

...tures" section, or send in patches for changes. Thanks! > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -- René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin DE Legal: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478 Managing Directors: Susanne Klaus, René Rebe http://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de

...-intrinsic make[1]: *** [/home/rene/src/llvm/lib/VMCore/Release/Intrinsics.gen.tmp] Aborted (core dumped) make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rene/src/llvm/lib/VMCore' Compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.2, C library: glibc 2.6.1 Any pointer how to fix this ppc64 / Linux issue is welcome, -- René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name

Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've found it to be quite stable for development. If you run into problems---poor

No, this is not the case. Just because you compile something to LLVM IR does not make the thing you compiled work on every architecture. You may even be able to retarget it to any architecture (it depends), but this in no way means the result will *actually work*. The LLVM IR generated by llvm-gcc is very architecture dependent. Theoretically you could make a C compiler that was mostly C

On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to use LLVM to compile and optimise code when I don't know > whether the target CPU is big- or little-endian. This would allow me > to create a single optimised LLVM bitcode binary of an application, > and then run it through a JIT compiler on systems of differening > endianness. Ok. > I realise that

...p://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name

Hi All, I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements. There are "a lot" of changes that went into 2.8, but I think I've scraped most of them out of the commits. However, it is also highly likely that I missed something, so if I missed your favorite feature, please speak

does that mean .o generated with gcc (.c -> .s and .s -> .o) will not contain llvm ir? i meant, final kernel bitcode ir arch independent and can be JIT with any arch-specific backend. Is it not the case? thanks, ashish On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Ashish Bijlani > <ashish.bijlani at

Hi, I'd like to use LLVM to compile and optimise code when I don't know whether the target CPU is big- or little-endian. This would allow me to create a single optimised LLVM bitcode binary of an application, and then run it through a JIT compiler on systems of differening endianness. I realise that in general the LLVM IR depends on various characteristics of the target; I'd just

...forwarded ports for remote hosts. As far as I can see there is no equivalent for remotely forwarded ports. Is there any reason this is not implemented? PS: Please CC since I'm not subscribed ... Yours, -- Ren? Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany) http://www.exactcode.de/ | http://www.t2-project.org/ +49 (0)30 255 897 45

hello all: I have two machines (approx 50 miles apart) that I need to create a co-located backup solution for. One machine will serve as a central fileserver for an office, and every week a backup of that directory will be sent through the internet to a box I have here locally. I am aware of rsync being able to run over SSH, however I need this to be totally automated (SSH opening, passwords

Hi all, today we had a performance issue transfering a big amount of data where one file was over 50GB. Rsync was tunneled over SSH and we expected the data to be synced within hours. However after over 10 hours the data is still not synced ... The sending box has rsync running with 60-80 % CPU load (2GHz Pentium 4) while the receiver is nearly idle. So far I had no acces to the poblematic

I have a simple backup shell script that I am using for backups. I have a problem which I think is a result of this error: rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred (code 24) at main.c(789) Any command after the rsync never gets executed if I get the above error. The file system is very large and we have engineers working at all hours so it is rare that this would