search for: everyons

Howdy all, I was wondering if there was a known bug with the everyone acl. When looking at the security tab on windows the everyone acl has the read permission. If I unselect it to give everyone no permission and hit apply, read becomes checked again. If I select deny everyone read, then a warning pops up saying this will deny read for all users and it does. If after that I give read to another

I have a pretty well working RH7.3 Samba 2.2.5 from RPM set up. I have searched the archives and the man pages but can't find an answer to this issue although I have a sneaking suspicion it is there somewhere. I have 3 groups set up under linux. everyone, engr, and sales. I have 3 shares. One share is set up for the engr group, one for the sales group, and one for everyone that gets shared

Hello forum. I''m in the process of re-organizing my server and ACL-settings. I''ve seen so many different ways of doing ACL, which makes me wonder how I should do it myself. This is obviously the easiest way, only describing the positive permissions: /usr/bin/chmod -R A=\ group:sa:full_set:fd:allow,\ group:vk:read_set:fd:allow \ However, I''ve seen people split each

Hello all, Am trying to set up a guest account for employees from other offices to come in the office to login and do stuff. I want to block access to all public drives so this is what I've done: Consider the SAMBA server in Office A and I want to create a guest account so that people from Office B and C can access. There is a public drive that everyone in Office A can edit, and a drive

Hi, I have a network with two domains. DOMAIN A has samba 3.0.28 as PDC (I know its old but it cant be updated due to political reasons). DOMAIN B is a Windows 2003 domain. Samba PDC (domain A) has few shares on it and everyone can access those shares (everyone from domain A and domain B). In domain A there are also few windows machines which also have shares. I'd like for those shares to be

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 4 juli 2019 16:05 .... > > > Here it is in big letters: > > DO NOT TOUCH THE 'SHARE' TAB ON WINDOWS, THERE IS NO NEED! That all depends on the setup and if you know that your doing, there is no problem with changing

I''m currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba. I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory, with ACL mapping working. I''m a little confused as to the behavior of the ZFS ACL though. on a brand-new filesystem, touching a file results in: -rw-r--r-- 1 root

Hi all: Thanks for your attention. I have a question about smb.conf. I want add ‘everyone’ to write list of a share, but ‘ALL’ and ‘everyone’ doesn’t work, I want to know how to add everyone to write list ? thanks ________________________________ fengwei 11322 (RD) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have a small number of phones, when a call comes in we want all the phones that aren't in use to ring. Is there a simple way to test and see what phones are in use then ring the other phones? I tried some code like this: [zap] exten => s,1,Answer exten => s,2,ChanIsAvail(${DERRICK}) exten => s,3,SetVar,"EVERYONE=${DERRICK}" exten => s,4,ChanIsAvail(${DON}) exten

On 1/31/24 09:50, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > The crucial problem here is, that Everyone (yes, really everyone) can > write to the root share. why don't you just change it? That's how it's supposed to work. -slow -- SerNet Samba Team Lead https://samba.plus/ Samba Team Member https://samba.org/ SAMBA+ packages https://samba.plus/ SerNet

I created a share with the config I gave below. As you can see in pictures I have two Everyone at "Permission" and one Everyone at "Share" section. These permissions comes when i create a share.. One of them is definitely related to samba because it is in the "share" section, but I guess the other two permits are comes with "posix acl". But i did not add

hi, 2012 has been a great and eventful year for CentOS, the project. CentOS the Linux Distribution and for everyone involved, including the users. Along with new initiatives, lots of new relationships came up - and most of all, lots of new people stepped up to help in various corners of the project. Hope to see even more new efforts kicking off in 2013 and even more people getting involved.

Hi all, I have a problem setting ACL on a share like below: /data /user /user_1 /user_2 /user_ ... Particularry if I want to get complete control to a user on his personal folder but get off any permission to Everyone group also this user (that belongs to Everyone) cannot list and access to his folder. When I was connected to NT4 server I didn't have this kind of problem. I have check

On 31.01.2024 10:09, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > On 1/31/24 09:50, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> The crucial problem here is, that Everyone (yes, really everyone) can >> write to the root share. > > why don't you just change it? That's how it's supposed to work. > > -slow > Hi Ralph, Unfortunately, that doesn't work. In share permissions,

I am running a test system with Solaris 10u6 and I am somewhat confused as to how ACE inheritance works. I''ve read through http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfsadmin.pdf but it doesn''t seem to cover what I am experiencing. The ZFS file system that I am working on has both aclmode and aclinherit set to passthrough, which I thought would result in the ACEs being just

In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: Samba version 4.1.1 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:10.0.0.109:49178) 7364 george Everyone 10.0.0.60 (ipv4:10.0.0.60:49232) In Samba 3.6 it was like this: Samba version 3.6.24 PID

In migrating to Samba on FreeBSD from Win(yuck)NT, I?ve run into this hitch. Let us say I have 9 users named User1, User2, User3, ? User9 User1 is a member of group wheel User2 & User3 have the administrative task (add/change/delete) of managing the content of the directory Dirc1 and all subordinate objects (files and directories). Dirc1 is the directory /usr/Shared/Dirc1. Only User1

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:38:31 +0100 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 31.01.2024 10:09, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > > On 1/31/24 09:50, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > >> The crucial problem here is, that Everyone (yes, really everyone) > >> can write to the root share. > > > > why don't you just

Hello Everyone I just bough my Xten Eyebeam but i don figure out how to make the video works i only see a black screen where de remote video suposse to appear, Any help regarding this matter will be very preciated Thank You

For samba 2.2.8a Well, I have found that the problem I'm seeing is that in W2K it will not let you remove all permissions from say Everyone. For example in UNIX the file permission is set to 0644. I want to remove the read permission for Everyone from W2K. In the Security tab, when I try to uncheck the read for Everyone and then hit "Apply" the read just gets