search for: everyhings

Downloaded 290/290 and kernel panic, not syncing. Same old Linux. Fortunately, hadn't started updates, /home had been unmounted by some forward-looking individual and there was a sync;sync and blockdev -- flushbufs running every 15 seconds. =>:-o Pucker factor went from {O} to {o} to }{ the max! Anyway, a quick reboot, fsck, split the check-update into 2 arbitrary pieces and do it again.

On 2020/8/4 ??5:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> ? +struct vhost_vring_call { >>>>> +??? struct eventfd_ctx *ctx; >>>>> +??? struct irq_bypass_producer producer; >>>>> +??? spinlock_t ctx_lock; >>>> It's not clear to me why we need ctx_lock here. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> Hi Jason,

On 2020/8/4 ??5:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> ? +struct vhost_vring_call { >>>>> +??? struct eventfd_ctx *ctx; >>>>> +??? struct irq_bypass_producer producer; >>>>> +??? spinlock_t ctx_lock; >>>> It's not clear to me why we need ctx_lock here. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> Hi Jason,

Just the sort of newbie question we all hate ;-) I'm a bit stuck with MOH. I think all is done right and I've read everyhing I can find, but whenever * tries to do MOH, all that happens is '-z: No such file or directory' Yes, I am on redHat. Yes I have installed real mpg123. Yes, it does seem to work from the command line. Any suggestions would be greta, I'm sire

Hi, i've already setup lots of samba boxes. Mostly large servers as PDC's or as domain members in large networks. No real problems far. A friend asked me to update a small network (3 Win 98 boxes and two Win 2000 boxes) from samba 2.0.6 on an ancient version of linux to samba on suse 8.2. The Win98 boxes use a login script to get their shares mounted the Win 2000 boxes have their shares

Hi I have built a custom TMB Mandrake kernel (2.4.22) with IMQ and ESFQ support. I statically compiled both (mistake?) ESFQ is sorted and working fine (I have succesfully patched IPROUTE2). I have got to the stage where I can see the IMQ device as UP with ifconfig. I can use TC to add QDISCs to the IMQ device. However I just cannot sort out IPTABLES to actually redirect packets to the IMQ

Hi, I notice that if two or more existing connections match an ingress policing filter, the input bandwidth does not get evenly divided up between the n connections. Kinda like litters of baby animals, where the stronger babies get more access to the mothers teats and grow up bigger and faster than their siblings. The only workaround that''s working for me is to set explicit ingress

On 2020/8/4 ??4:42, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > On 8/4/2020 4:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote: >>> This commit introduces struct vhost_vring_call which replaced >>> raw struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx in struct vhost_virtqueue. >>> Besides eventfd_ctx, it contains a spin lock and an >>> irq_bypass_producer

On 2020/8/4 ??4:42, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > On 8/4/2020 4:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote: >>> This commit introduces struct vhost_vring_call which replaced >>> raw struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx in struct vhost_virtqueue. >>> Besides eventfd_ctx, it contains a spin lock and an >>> irq_bypass_producer

Hello All, We would like to call quantile() function from the R-package STATS in a Delphi program. If this is possible, could anyone provide us with an example? Thanks in advance. --Anna ----------------------------------------- Anna Belova Abt Associates Inc. 4800 Montgomery Ln, St 600 Bethesda, MD-20814 phone: 301-347-5304 fax: 301-652-7530 http://www.abtassociates.com/environment

On 2020/8/5 ??1:49, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > On 8/5/2020 10:16 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/8/4 ??5:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>>>> ?? +struct vhost_vring_call { >>>>>>> +??? struct eventfd_ctx *ctx; >>>>>>> +??? struct irq_bypass_producer producer; >>>>>>> +??? spinlock_t

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:16:16AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/8/4 ??5:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > ? +struct vhost_vring_call { > > > > > > +??? struct eventfd_ctx *ctx; > > > > > > +??? struct irq_bypass_producer producer; > > > > > > +??? spinlock_t ctx_lock; > > > > > It's

Hello Timo, I switched this morning from dovecot-1.2.12 to 2.0.8 with a basic setup (high performance login mode, Maildir, everyhing on NFS, one shared but unused namespace). No problem so far except that some Thunderbird users who wouldn't succeed in moving messages from some one folder to another. They'd get a message about some illegal character in the mailboxname (already existing

Dear all, I compiled openssh-3.9p1 against uClibc on linux, and when I logged in to a system using this openssh, the /etc/motd didn't appear. I have checked everyhing, and made some debugging. As I have seen, session.c prepares the environment, and invokes the user's login shell, but before the execv() call, does not flush the stdout. And if I made it do to it, it began to work. I dont

I'm trying to use accountcodes, but experiencing inconsistant results. I have two * servers, one which appears to be working as expected and one not. I would like to prepend the device's accountcode to the dialed number. The sip1 server does not seem to have the ${ACCOUNTCODE} variable set when reading the extensions.conf, but sip2 server does. What troubleshooting or trace

...t; '/.*[\$%#>] $/', Output_record_separator => '',); #$fh = $t->dump_log("./telnet_log.txt"); # uncomment for telnet log $t->open("$server_ip"); i got error in this line $t->open("$server_ip"); my ip is 192.168.0.5 for asterisk and everyhings ok. the error i get is [root@asterisk astguiclient]# perl AST_SQL_update_channels.pl problem connecting to "192.168.0.5", port 5038: Connection refused at AST_SQL_update_channels.pl line 73 anyhting to do with port?? _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users m...

jg <webaccounts173 at jgoettgens.de> schrieb: > It doesn't really depend on your sip.conf and Asterisk. Your gateway/router > will be the major problem. My summer project will be to look at session Are you sure? Right now I'm using an italian SIP-Provider (Messagenet), configured in my sip.conf and I can receive calls without any problem... So, I don't think, I have to

Hello all, After many time reading a lot of stuff I am quite confident using LARTC to route my trafic. I am still working on QoS (by package type and so on) but it will stay in my studing class for a long time... ;) So lets go to my question... I mounted a router that makes my conections throug 2 external interfaces. Its working fine and my default gateway for entire network behind

Hi! Maybe someone could help me out? When a call is routed via a2billing AGI and user does a transfer, the call is dropped. If the trunk is called directly everyhing works. Here's a direct scenario (working fine): [pbx000001] exten => 101,1,Set(__TRANSFER_CONTEXT=pbx000001) exten => 101,n,Dial(SIP/pozitel/37129238254,45,t) exten => 102,1,Dial(SIP/12345,60) so, when user calls ext

Hello Gordon, yeah. it is really strange. from one boot to the next, everyhing is f** up.(2 months between). any idea? [root at quad live]# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 1.8T 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 1.8T 0 part