search for: everybodyyy

...at anyone who is still using an > NT4-style domain upgrades to AD. From Samba 4.11.0, they will no > longer work by default, though you can reconfigure smb.conf to keep > them working. > > Rowland > > Do not stress it, don't bother, save yourself time & energy. I assume everybodyyy! knows it only some of us can't do so. many thanks, L.

...t; NT4-style domain upgrades to AD. From Samba 4.11.0, they will no >> longer work by default, though you can reconfigure smb.conf to keep >> them working. >> >> Rowland >> >> > Do not stress it, don't bother, save yourself time & energy. I assume > everybodyyy! knows it only some of us can't do so. I repeat, upgrade, even if you think you cannot do so, one of these days, it might not work any more. Rowland

...AD. From Samba 4.11.0, they will no >>> longer work by default, though you can reconfigure smb.conf to keep >>> them working. >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> >> Do not stress it, don't bother, save yourself time & energy. I assume >> everybodyyy! knows it only some of us can't do so. > I repeat, upgrade, even if you think you cannot do so, one of these > days, it might not work any more. > > Rowland > > >

hi guys, what would be an absolute minimum on the list of sevices one should have for NT style domain? (userdb in separate LDAP, dns too is in bind9) And maybe even less need for stand-alone server? many thanks, L.