search for: eventmachine_t

...45b5b5 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 #4 0x28460795 in __cxxabiv1::__terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 #5 0x284607d2 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 #6 0x28460712 in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 #7 0x2829f75d in EventMachine_t::ConnectToServer () from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/rubyeventmachine.so #8 0x282a4433 in evma_connect_to_server () from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/rubyeventmachine.so #9 0x282a25fe in t_connect_server () from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd...

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8