search for: event_add_idle

...on 0 of length 72 (0 toread) : 19 Time(s) smbd/process.c:2406(smbd_process) Unable to get tcp info for CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT: Transport endpoint is not connected : 20 Time(s) smbd/process.c:286(receive_smb_raw_talloc) receive_smb_raw: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_RESET : 1 Time(s) smbd/process.c:740(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(deadtime) 0x2b0fd6dcdf00 : 1 Time(s) smbd/process.c:740(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(deadtime) 0x2b0fd6dd69e0 : 19 Time(s) smbd/process.c:740(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(housekeeping) 0x2b0fd6e50420 : 1 Time(s) smbd/process.c:740(event_add_id...

Hi, Jeremy: > That isn't any use. We don't need to know what is going on at the client, we need to know what is going on at the server. I pasted the samba log here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaoShuFeng/paste/master/samba_log The file I fsync()ing is called `aaa`. I can see some log about this file. Thanks Cao 在 2018年02月02日 21:07, Jeremy Allison 写道: > On Fri, Feb 02,

....so ? ?#12 0x8179b89d <smbd_smb2_send_oplock_break+3309> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd_base.so ? ?#13 0x8179cda8 <smbd_smb2_first_negprot+5192> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd_base.so ? ?#14 0x829012cc <run_events_poll+684> at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 ? ?#15 0x82901b0d <event_add_idle+1309> at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 ? ?#16 0x840f1602 <_tevent_loop_once+114> at /usr/local/lib/libtevent.so.0 ? ?#17 0x81786cd1 <smbd_process+1969> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd_base.so ? ?#18 0x102b20e <main+9294> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd ? ?#19 0x829012cc <run_events...

...4 0x801ad5066 <smbd_smb2_first_negprot+0x3776> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: #15 0x8039cd976 <run_events_poll+0x6b6> at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: #16 0x8039ce7c4 <event_add_idle+0x994> at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: #17 0x80528d842 <_tevent_loop_once+0x72> at /usr/local/lib/libtevent.so.0 > Mar 7 15:18:54 xxxxxx smbd_audit[51710]: #18 0x80528da7b <tevent_common_loop_wait+0x3b> at /usr/local/lib/libt...

...0x801857f25 <smbd_smb2_send_oplock_break+6277> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd_base.so #31 0x80185bf96 <smbd_smb2_first_negprot+16214> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd_base.so #32 0x802da5446 <run_events_poll+1718> at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 #33 0x802da6244 <event_add_idle+2372> at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 #34 0x80492b602 <_tevent_loop_once+114> at /usr/local/lib/libtevent.so.0 #35 0x801830726 <smbd_process+5830> at /usr/local/lib/samba/libsmbd_base.so #36 0x102ec4a <main+15626> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #37 0x802da5446 <r...

..._data=(nil) [2016/12/14 08:17:38.026661, 5, pid=30811, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/messages.c:384(messaging_register) Registering messaging pointer for type 1 - private_data=(nil) [2016/12/14 08:17:38.026668, 10, pid=30811, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/events.c:483(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(keepalive) 0x7ff15c690080 [2016/12/14 08:17:38.026674, 10, pid=30811, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/events.c:483(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(deadtime) 0x7ff15c6902d0 [2016/12/14 08:17:38.026682, 10, pid=30811, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../...

...data=(nil) [2020/08/26 09:53:02.413050, 5, pid=2553, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/messages.c:356(messaging_register) Registering messaging pointer for type 1 - private_data=(nil) [2020/08/26 09:53:02.413074, 10, pid=2553, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/util_event.c:99(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(keepalive) 0x205ca08 [2020/08/26 09:53:02.413092, 10, pid=2553, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/util_event.c:99(event_add_idle) event_add_idle: idle_evt(deadtime) 0x205ca68 [2020/08/26 09:53:02.413114, 10, pid=2553, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/l...

Mandi! Rowland penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Even though your users may have the same username in AD as in the NT4-style > domain, they are different users, so a few thoughts. You have 'map to guest > = bad user', so I take it you must have 'guest ok = yes' set in the shares > (you haven't shown us the shares), so try changing 'bad user' to

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --