search for: evalut

To the list: What R commands will perform the score test on an ordered multinomial logit model to evaluate the proportional odds assumption? Many thanks. Mtichell Wachtel [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, Is it possible to run R in command line to evalute R expressions and return results to stdout, something like >R CMD -e "R.version$minor" then you got return >"8.1" Or do a simple calculation >R CMD -e "sin(1.2)" >0.932039 Thanks. -- Pingping Zheng Department of Mathematics and Statistics Fylde Co...

...try to run this expression: x<-sapply(rnorm(rep(10,100000),mean=9,sd=1.5),mean) it evaluates the first 10000 values and then stops, but does not return to the command prompt. My cpu keeps running at 100%. When I exit the expression with CTL-C, I then see that x holds 10000 values. How can I evalute the expression 100000 times, or more if I want? Thanks in advance.

Here is the test code. foo<-function(x) exp(-x) for (i in 1:5) { foo<-function(x) foo(x)*x foo(2) } The error is "evalution nested too deeply". I tried Recall() but it didn't work either. Thanks a lot for your input.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de > wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:38:58AM -0600, Richard wrote: > > Oops, meant to send this to the mailing list instead of to Reid > > privately. (Why cc the mailing list instead of just sending to the > > mailing list?) > > > > In article <CACs= >

I have selected 4 software packages for us to evaluate in order to decide on the best possible engine for the much-requested cAos Community Wiki. All 4 samples are now up and running for you to try out, play around with, and evalute. The URL's are as follows: https://caos.nplus1.net/c-arbre/ https://caos.nplus1.net/dokuwiki/ https://caos.nplus1.net/pwp/ https://caos.nplus1.net/tikiwiki/ Both C-Arbre and Tikiwiki allow for individual user registration and accounts, and they both offer more than simply a Wiki engine. Dok...

...<= "m" <= 5)) The above command works perfectly in R 1.9.1 but returns an error in R 2.0.1 This is documented in NEWS for R 2.0.0 (or ONEWS in R 2.0.1) and it is said: o R no longer accepts associative use of relational operators. That is, 3 < 2 < 1 (which used to evalute as TRUE!) now causes a syntax error. If this breaks existing code, just add parentheses -- or braces in the case of plotmath. It is true that the following command does not give en error, however, I do not what the extra brackets in the plot: plot(1:10,main=expression(1 <= (&quo...

Hi all, I'm doing Multiple linear regression for a data set. However, it takes a lot of time, as I would like to check every possible combination of factors, evalute the results based for instance on their p values, and then choose the best regression model. So, I wonder if anyone might have a script for that? Or if not, do you have some suggestions how to create such a script? I've been told there is a similar function in SAS, but I'm not sure how i...

Hello, I am a very new user to R so please have patience with me. :clap: I am trying to evalute the "internal response" for a couple of different cluster methods with the help of the AdjustedRandIndex, which is included in the mclust package. However, I do get a bit puzzled when I get a negative value as the value should be in intervall of [0,1], am I correct? Have I done somethi...

hello there, any one who used ASTCC in a real enviroment, or has successfully handled above 1k simultanous calls. need some evalution of ASTCC. if any one has such an experience please share it with the rest thank you Atif

This has been asked before, but I just cannot figure out why lapply should behave this way given that R uses lazy evalution. Even after reading (or at least trying to read) parts of the R language definition. > f <- function(x) {function() {x}} > a <- list(f(1), f(2), f(3)) > a[[1]]() # as expected [1] 1 > a[[2]]() # as expected [1] 2 > a[[3]]() # as expected [1] 3 > b <- sapply(1:3, f) &g...

...domain for a group of primary schools with 1000+ desktop and 10k accounts. The domain run mostly ok except for some replications issues, however joining a new DC just takes eons and so does dbcheck. After some investigation into dbcheck (4.1.17) and some "human powered" valgrind like evalution using pudb, I came to the conclusion that it was the computation of the memberof attribute that was to blame. Disabling that attribute check in the dbcheck code did solve the issue. Actually there was a "pupils" group where all new pupils were automaticaly added (and which had in f...

R help list subscribers, I am a new user of R. I am attempting to use R to explore a set of equations specifying the dynamics of a three trophic level food chain. I have put together this code for the function that is to be evaluted by LSODA. My equations Rprime, Cprime, and Pprime are meant to describe the actual equation of the derivative. When I run LSODA, I do not get the output that these equations should be giving. Can someone tell me if I have set this function up correctly to use with LSODA when the user is sp...

...fied Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: kfm at plushkava.net This concerns a minor usability issue that I noticed after evaluting some of the criticism in the GitHub issue referenced by bug 1434. In the GitHub issue, one critic complains that this sample ruleset does not work as expected: define BASE_ALLOWED_INCOMING_TCP_PORTS = {22, 80, 443} define EXTRA_ALLOWED_INCOMING_TCP_PORTS = {} table inet filter { chain...

...ain); } Here, sumlog is the second element of the resulting vector. However, the "if(gain < 1e4) {" check does not explicitly check against negative values of the gain variable. Indeed, whenever the gain variable assumes a negative value, the statement "sumlog += log(gain);" evalutes to NaN. I changed the check as follows: if (gain > 0 && gain < 1e4) { This avoids computation of logarithms on negative values. I recompiled and reinstalled R, and the sumlog value is no more 'NaN'. As a result, optim() never warns about the non-finite finite-difference va...

Hi, I'm currently working on evalutating a AD-Domain for my Department. Since I have a couple of year experince in running a NT-Style Domain, my choice is samba - nowadays AD-DS. Now I'm stuck, and I would really appreciate some more thoughts and a push in the right direction. :-) Thank your in advance Franz The facts: A qui...

Following the directions for using RJS has nearly worked for me - actually I''m using it successfully but not the way its documented and others have reported it working. The javascript code is generated properly but its not evaluted. I followed instructions found at: http://www.codyfauser.com/articles/2005/11/20/rails-rjs-templates and http://rails.techno-weenie.net/tip/2005/11/29/ajaxed_forms_with_rjs_templates My template is very simple right now, I just include the partial that I would have been updating from before:...

Hello!!! Thank you all for your suggestion on my last question about locfit. Now I have another question: I would like to change the evalution structure ev in locfit() to a vector/matrix. I created a vector and a matrix: > vec <- mat.or.vec(101, 1) > vec <- c(0:100) > mat <- matrix(data = vec, nrow = 101, ncol = 1) and I tried to change the ev parameter: > fit <- locfit(~imposter, kern="gauss", r...

Hi. The following statement works fine in R-win 1.8.0, but yields a syntax error in R-win 2.0.1 (and possibly in other versions after 1.8.0): plot(c(1,2),main=expression(a==b==c)) I note that the following workaround executes successfully in both versions of R... plot(c(1,2),main=expression(a*"="*b*"="*c)) ...but I don't really understand

Hi R People: Sorry about the off topic question. Does anyone know the reference for "-2 Log Lambda is approx dist. Chi square", please? It may be Bartlett, but I'm not sure.... thanks in advance! Sincerely, Laura Holt mailto: holtlaura at gmail.com