search for: evaluation

Hi, I have a rather complex xml document that I am attempting to parse based on attributes: <Manifest xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <!-- eName : name of the element. eValue : value of the element. --> <OutputFilePath>D:\CN_data\Agilent\Results\</OutputFilePath> <FilesList> <File>

Hi. I have a small problem with the custom type I am working on. I define method ''evaluate'' which is called after all data is been collected. Here it is: module Puppet newtype(:test) do newparam(:name) do end newparam(:listen) do defaultto "silent" end def evaluate puts "evaluating..." return super.evaluate end

Hi. On 12/30/06, Bhanu Kalyan.K <kalyansikha at yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Mr.Bengtsson, > > The steps you have suggested are working for single lines of matlab > statements. But, as i mentioned earlier, If i want to see the output of an > entire matlab code (say swissroll.m) then you suggested me to do > res <- evaluate(matlab, "swissroll"). > When i did

Hello, struggling with the very basic needs... :( any help appreciated. #using the package doBY #who drinks how much beer per day and therefor cannot calculate rowise maxvals evaluation=data.frame(date=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), name=c("Michael","Steve","Bob", "Michael","Steve","Bob","Michael","Steve","Bob"), vol=c(3,5,4,2,4,5,7,6,7)) evaluation # maxval=summaryBy(vol ~ name,data=evaluation,FUN =...

Hello, and sorry if this is already explained somewhere. I couldn't find anything. R (2.3.1, Windows) seems to perform some kind of lazy evaluation when evaluating defaults in function calls that, at least for me, leads to unexpected results. Consider the following, seemingly equivalent functions: > foo1 <- function(x, y=x) { + x <- 0 + y + } > foo1(1) [1] 0 > foo2 <- function(x, y=x) { + y <- y + x <- 0 +...

...und(X) and abs(X) parallelly on a set of 50 input rows which resulted in segmentation fault after getting the following errors. Error: unprotect_ptr: pointer not found Error: argument to 'findVar' is not an environment I am using the following code snippet for initializing R, parsing and evaluation of R expression // For initialization int res= Rf_initEmbeddedR(R_argc, (char**)R_argv); // For parsing and evaluation SEXP cmd1= Rf_mkChar(rscript); SEXP cmdSexp, cmdexpr, sresult = R_NilValue; ParseStatus status; R_len_t i=0; PROTECT(cmdSexp = Rf_allocVector(STRSXP, 1));...

...estpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Loading required package: testpkg Error during wrapup: evaluation is nested too deeply: infinite recursion? Loading required package: testpkg Error in options(x) : evaluation is nested too deeply: infinite recursion? Error: evaluation is nested too deeply: infinite recursion? Error: evaluation is nested too deeply: infinite recursion? Error: evaluation is nested...

...<- function(er) { foo(er) } > foo(a) [1] 5 > bar(a) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "a" not found Now, regarding the "bar(a)" call, this is my understanding of what happens, hoping someone will correct me where I'm wrong. 1) bar is called. Its evaluation frame contains the association "er=a". 2) bar calls foo. So foo is called, and its evaluation frame contains the association "expr=er", with enclosing environment the local environment of bar. 3) foo calls eval. 4) eval starts by evaluating "substitute(expr)" in fo...

...pture the arguments and return value, respectively. I can think of only one fundamental conceptual obstacle to this approach: R functions are not necessarily referentially transparent. The arguments received by a function are not values but promises. They can be evaluated directly ("standard evaluation"), after applying arbitrary syntactic transformations ("non-standard evaluation", aka NSE), or not at all. Therefore, if you peek at the values of function arguments before evaluating the function, you risk altering the semantics of the program, possibly fatally. I'm looking fo...

Dear R Help folks -- I have been trying to put together a list of the steps or stages of R function evaluation, with particular focus on those that have "standard" or "nonstandard" forms. This is both for my own edification and also because I am thinking of joining the world of R bloggers and have been trying to put together some draft posting that might be useful. I seem to have an affi...

Full_Name: Jelle Goeman Version: 2.4.0 OS: windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33) Hi, I like to use optimize() to optimize functions whose evaluation is costly in terms of computation time. The Brent algorithm which is implemented in optimize was designed to optimize a function with as few function evaluations as possible. Therefore it bothers me that optimize() always evaluates the function twice at the optimal value. This can be seen for examp...

...delayedAssign. In the below example x switches values the first two times it is evaluated. > delayedAssign("x", {x <- 2; x+3}) > x==x [1] FALSE > delayedAssign("x", {x <- 2; x+3}) > x [1] 5 > x [1] 2 The ?delayedAssign documentation says that "after [evaluation], the value is fixed and the expression will not be evaluated again." However, this appears not to be true. Is this a bug, or just a good way to write extremely obfuscated code? Robert McGehee, CFA Geode Capital Management, LLC One Post Office Square, 28th Floor | Boston, MA | 02109 Direct: (...

...mful or not ? Here below my rsync command and some of the error messages : rsync --delete -zrv --bwlimit=$bwlimit --timeout=1200 --exclude-from='/etc/rsync/exclude' $user\@" . $server . "::htdocs/$dir/ /var/www/htdocs/$dir/ send_files failed to open www.lft.mg/matieres/svt/Evaluations/CLASSE.GIF: No such file or directory send_files failed to open www.lft.mg/matieres/svt/Evaluations/COUPES.GIF: No such file or directory send_files failed to open www.lft.mg/matieres/svt/Evaluations/DBasalte.gif: No such file or directory send_files failed to open www.lft.mg/matieres/svt/Evalu...

Hi all, I have evaluated new weighting schemes along with their existing counterparts in Xapian to compare and see which one does better job. Also, I have put together all the results files for easy access here: https://github.com/ivmarkp/xapian-evaluation/tree/evaluation/run and a README for getting started with xapian-evaluation module. Hopefully, it might be of help to those who are new to evaluating weighting schemes in Xapian :) Comparing the MAP to access the retrieval effectiveness, some interesting results have emerged as follows: 1. BM25+...

Hi - I?m running the OpenSCAP STIG profile on a new CentOS 7.1611 installation, and I get a few failures that look like this (output from openscap scan ?verbosity INFO). I suspect this is because the openscap module is not accepting CentOS 7 as RHEL 7 for rules purposes, despite an early check for "Community Enterprise Operating System 7? which succeeds. 1. Am I correct in why it?s

Full_Name: W.B.Kloke Version: 1.8.0 OS: FreeBSD-4.7 Submission from: (NULL) (195.253.22.63) I found a parameter evaluation inconsistency in NLME package. I tried to use gls() inside a function, and I wanted use gls() for different subsets of a data frame: prgls <- function(name){ gls( log10(Y)~(cond-1)+(cond-1):t ,pr,subset=subject==name)} Applying this function with a string as parameter like prgls("VM"...

Hi friends, Please help me with this bug. *Bug in my code:* In this variable sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1] I store the where clause.every sub group has a where condition linked with it. Database1 Where clause was not found for a particular subgroup, sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1] value was NULL So the condition (*sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1]=="NULL" ||

I've meant to ask the following for several years now. I understand why: > foo <- function(x, dim=dim) { dim } > foo(1) Error in foo(1) : promise already under evaluation: recursive default argument reference or earlier problems? gives an error, but why wouldn't/couldn't the following work? > foo <- function(x, dim=dim(x)) { dim } > foo(1) Error in foo(1) : promise already under evaluation: recursive default argument reference or earlier problem...

Hi, I have the following on a view <% for evaluation in @evaluations %> <td><%=h evaluation[0].name %></td> <td><%=evaluation[1].object_id %></td> <td><%= link_to( "Start", :action =>''evaluatie'', :id => evaluation[1].object_id) %></td> <%end%&g...

Hello all, We''re using Puppet/Puppetmaster 2.6.4 (2.6.4-2ubuntu2 on Ubuntu 11.04 to be precise), and after enabling pluginsync on the agents to make our custom facts available, all puppet runs start with the output: info: Retrieving plugin err: /File[/var/lib/puppet/lib/puppet/parser/functions/basename.rb]: Could not evaluate: Not a directory - /var/lib/puppet/lib/puppet/