search for: eui

...art --nohome --type=lvm --fstype=xfs ================ When I install from a USB drive it works OK and I have the following in /dev/disk/by-id lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-SAMSUNG_MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7_S64KNE0R161810 -> ../../nvme0n1 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-eui.002538b11102f46d -> ../../nvme0n1 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 5 10:28 wwn-eui.002538b11102f46d-part3 -> ../../nvme0n1p3 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-SAMSUNG_MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7_S64KNE0R161810-part3 -> ../../nvme0n1p3 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-eui.00...

...type=xfs > ================ > > When I install from a USB drive it works OK and I have the following in /dev/disk/by-id > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-SAMSUNG_MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7_S64KNE0R161810 -> ../../nvme0n1 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-eui.002538b11102f46d -> ../../nvme0n1 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 5 10:28 wwn-eui.002538b11102f46d-part3 -> ../../nvme0n1p3 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 5 10:28 nvme-SAMSUNG_MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7_S64KNE0R161810-part3 -> ../../nvme0n1p3 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 5 10...

...responsibility. _________________________________________________________ Alicia P?rez-Alonso Departament of Economics European University Institute via della Piazzuola 43 50133 Firenze (FI) ITALY Room: 40 (Second Floor) Phone: (+39) 0554685955 Fax: (+39) 0554685902 E-mail: alicia.perez-alonso at eui.eu URL: http://www.eui.eu/Personal/Fellows/Perez-Alonso/

...ld bypass the existing countermeasures. > > I suppose in the next few days, I'll try reproducing my original steps > with the new version and see what happens. You may want to try this on IPv6 where you are frequently changing the attackers MAC address. If the IP is constructed with EUI-64 then it could start to flood the table used to store the penalized IPs. I'd really like to see what that looks like, especially in terms of CPU/memory utilization.

...--------------------- The same problem occurs under Linux. Shall I specify a direct path to libs or modify NAMESPACE? konrad --- Konrad Smolinski Economics Department European University Institute Badia Fiesolana Via dei Roccettini 9 I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) ITALY konrad.smolinski at eui.eu konrad.smolinski at gmail.com

...with a problem. It is working on a mchine with the class C address 198.xxx.xxx.xxx. Any PC's with that on that IP address can see the server just fine. However, we also have another class C 207.xxx.xxx.xxx and folks on that one cannot see the server. We have seen this problem before and NetBeui solved that one. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Paul Crittenden System Manager Simpson College e-mail: crittend@storm.simpson.edu

On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 09:19 -0400, chris wrote: > real world example (current snapshot of portable on linux v. dheater) Thanks for this. However, much more extensive testing would be needed to show it is a complete solution. In my original research article, I used CPU idle time as the main metric. Also, I showed that very low- latency network links could bypass the existing countermeasures.

...ant connections to be broken will use 64 bit addresses. Old applications will keep running until you migrate. > It also opens up the question how unique CIDs are allocated across > hosts. I think it's actually a good idea to define this, rather than leave things in the air. For example, EUI-64 can be used. > Given that AF_VSOCK in Linux already exists in the 32-bit CID version, > I'd prefer to make virtio-vsock compatible with that for the time being. Yes, so we cut corners in order to ship it quickly, but that is implementation. Linux can be extended. Why limit the protoc...

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:12:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:15:29PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:13:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:37:37PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > Michael pointed out that the virtio-vsock draft specification does not > >

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:12:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:15:29PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:13:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:37:37PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > Michael pointed out that the virtio-vsock draft specification does not > >