Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "euhm".
Did you mean:
ehm
2007 Aug 14
0
Maximum retries for seqno 102 when re-inviting.
We have an interesting issue:
One of our providers has two softswitches. Calls coming from the
first one are handled fine by asterisk, calls coming from the second
one and going through the first one are euhm... dropped half a
second into the RTP stream.
I have opened a ticket at Digium for it:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10449
The output of "sip debug" is funny from line 366, where it is
transmitting and re-transmitting a lot of re-invites back to the
softswitch with CSeq 102.
H...
2007 Jun 18
0
[Nut-upsuser] false alerts/shutdown
> driver.name: newhidups
[...]
> ups.status: OL CHRG
Euhm, there is no status 'CHRG' according to 'docs/new-drivers.txt'
folks. If you feel the need to create new status flags, at the very
least mention them in the section 'Status data' in this file. Unless you
document it somewhere, it's of no use to clients.
[soapbox]
Before...
2007 Jun 29
0
CHRG / DISCHRG status
(was: false alerts/shutdown)
2007/6/18, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org>:
>
> > driver.name: newhidups
>
> [...]
>
> > ups.status: OL CHRG
>
> Euhm, there is no status 'CHRG' according to 'docs/new-drivers.txt'
> folks. If you feel the need to create new status flags, at the very
> least mention them in the section 'Status data' in this file. Unless you
> document it somewhere, it's of no use to clients.
&g...
2008 Feb 07
2
Some questions
Hello all NUT users and developers!
Have some questions about nut suite:
1. Does upscmd provide only device-specific commands? Or commands
like shutdown.stayoff are general and good for all ups models?
When i see output of 'upscmd -l' - is this general commands
that supported by given device or this is unique commands of this device?
For example, i have APC SmartUPS-750 and it shows me
2015 Oct 13
3
transferring large encrypted images.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I was wondering if I could ask this question here.
>
> Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block
> encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I
> found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a
>