search for: euh

On Wed, 10 Jul, at 03:44:57PM, Andreas Heinlein wrote: > Am 08.07.2013 18:32, schrieb Matt Fleming: > >I just released 6.02-pre2 which includes support for booting 32-bit > >kernels from efi64. I know a number of people wanted this feature, so > >hopefully it will be tested in various environments. > > > >One thing to note is that it is not possible to boot a

...ri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:16:10AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Gene Cumm wrote: > > > If so: http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Mboot.c32 > > I???m not permitted to edit either that page or its talk page. > Do I submit the content addition here, then? Euh, yes, that is an option. Hereby I volunteer for updating the wiki with updates that get to this mailinglist. This should allow other people in the Syslinux project to make the Syslinux wiki a wiki that resists spam. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven

...> > Any further info I can give you to debug this? Are there any > > > specific requirements for the kernel? > > > > You could try running, > > > > debug.c32 -e efi_boot_linux handover_boot > > > > before executing your kernel. > > > Euh how? Where? > > In a syslinux config file? > At the `boot:` prompt? > > Please provide an example. It needs a lot of work but an example is here, http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Development/Debugging#Syslinux_Dynamic_Debugger -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technolog...

...>> >> union { >> float __a[4]; >> __m128 __v; >> } __u __attribute__((aligned(16))); >> >> And it works again. This is definitely a GCC bug, but I thought I'd >> mention it here in case others have similar problems. > > That's, euh... "interesting". Did you submit a bug report to the gcc > team? I guess I could add your code as a workaround (do you know what > version started supporting that attribute?) until it's fixed. I just > find it amazing how many bugs in gcc Speex has managed to trigger. I >...

...packets. > > syslinux.efi either crashed or just can't get packets out. Either of > which is bad, obviously. And a thrid option, still bad: Send out packets didn't get across gateway. That is possible when the mirror port is at the same side of a gateway as the TFTP server is. Euh, I mean visible where I said possible. Please confirm where in the network the tcpdump is made, or even better: capture the packets near the booting machine. Something else: How many gateway / routers are involved? Groeten Geert Stappers Yes, it is good to respect the discussion order -- Leven...

hi attached is a patch fixing some build warnings with ip3k-elf-gcc (gcc 3.4-20030722-Ubicom-63-1211). not all fixes are elegant, please review carefully before applying.. /alfred -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: warnings.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 17666 bytes Desc: not available Url :

I am trying to do file transfers through tftpd under fedora and I need the server to be case insensitive. I could not find any way to achieve this! Manual is useless! As an example I need to transfer file "foo.ext" even if I request file "FOO.Ext" which now spits an error saying that it does not exists. How can I do that?

Spam detection software, running on the system "mix.hive.no", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I recently found a .. weird bug on Win32 SSE with GCC

...an't get packets out. Either of > > > which is bad, obviously. > > > > And a thrid option, still bad: Send out packets didn't get across gateway. > > > > That is possible when the mirror port is at the same side of a gateway > > as the TFTP server is. Euh, I mean visible where I said possible. > > > > Please confirm where in the network the tcpdump is made, > > or even better: capture the packets near the booting machine. > > > > Something else: How many gateway / routers are involved? > > > > The setup I w...

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

Hi All, I am a Speex novice but trying to use Speex in my Doctoral thesis. I installed Speex, was able to encode and decode files. Right now, I want to write my own cpp program that handle Speex-files. I tried to compile and run the two sample programs that come with the documentation (after having insalled the speex-devel-1.0.5-1.i386.rpm). However, when I compile. gcc sampleenc.cc Here is

On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Gene Cumm wrote: > >> mostly in C and be BIOS-only) or making the MirOS kernel act like > >> either an MBOOT kernel or a Linux kernel (for their boot protocols), The MirBSD _bootloader_ (not kernel) can act as a Multiboot kernel. It can then use disc access (not PXE), or you can pass it the ?real? kernel, but also e.g. configuration files, as Multiboot

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/9/8, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > it actually is complicated. the libFLAC api is not suited to a > > multithreaded design because the i/o is stream-based, not file- > > based. flac(.exe) is the file-based wrapper around libFLAC that > > allows it to work on files. the way libFLAC buffers

...@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ static const struct dhcp_options dhcp_opts[] = { > {15, local_domain}, > {43, vendor_encaps}, > {52, option_overload}, > - {54, server}, > {61, client_identifier}, > {67, bootfile_name}, > {97, uuid_client_identifier}, Euh, could this be reviewed: diff --git a/core/fs/pxe/dhcp_option.c b/core/fs/pxe/dhcp_option.c index 8d93a6a..b82e944 100644 --- a/core/fs/pxe/dhcp_option.c +++ b/core/fs/pxe/dhcp_option.c @@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ static const struct dhcp_options dhcp_opts[] = { {15, local_domain}, {43, vendo...

...der using 8.3 file names format for c32 files > instead of such a long file name. Example of such a long file name? So we know which file name to surpress into 8.3. ( yes, CP/M file name convention legacy is still present ) > If possible, also use short names for source files too. TIA. Euh, please visit http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/conf/2015-MSR-Unix-History/html/Spi15c.html scroll down to '4 Data Uses', check the graphic, especial file name length. My point: _Why_ restrict the development system file name length? And now something completely different: > > ___...

The manual says (about prio): > Because it doesn''t actually shape, the same warning as for SFQ holds: > either use it only if your physical link is really full or wrap it > inside a classful qdisc that does shape. The latter holds for almost all > cable modems and DSL devices. I want to wrap prio inside of tbf. Here''s why: I have a server on a DSL line, which has

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:45 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > Can something be done by means of PCIe capabilities? > ATS (Address Translation Support) seems like a natural choice? Euh no... ATS is something else completely.... Cheers, Ben.

Hi, I'm trying to use a denoiser on a wince with a FIXED_POINT defined. Denoiser works OK - it removes the noise, but then it unacceptable hurts a voice. Here is a code that I use: #define TEST_DENOISE_SAMPLES 2000 void test_denoise() { FILE *fin; FILE *fout; spx_int32_t rate=0; int chan=1; int fmt=16; int denoise_enabled = 1; SpeexPreprocessState *preprocess;

...oy' > sampleenc.cc:(.text+0x18c): undefined reference to `speex_bits_destroy' > /tmp/ccXKa3LF.o:(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined reference to > `__gxx_personality_v0' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > Can anyone help me through the process, I am really lost. Euh, have you ever considered actually linking with the library? Jean-Marc P.S. Although that has nothing to do with your problem, 1.2beta1 is generally better than version 1.0.5.

...oat __a[4]; >>>> __m128 __v; >>>> } __u __attribute__((aligned(16))); >>>> >>>> And it works again. This is definitely a GCC bug, but I thought I'd >>>> mention it here in case others have similar problems. >>> That's, euh... "interesting". Did you submit a bug report to the gcc >>> team? I guess I could add your code as a workaround (do you know what >>> version started supporting that attribute?) until it's fixed. I just >>> find it amazing how many bugs in gcc Speex has man...