Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "etime_show".
2014 Nov 26
1
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
...5 ffff8818d465e000 ffffffff8164bec0 0000000000000001
0000000000000050 ffff8818b7097e18 ffffffffa06ff785 ffff8818b7097e38
0000000000000246 0000000054755e3a 0000000039f8ba72 ffff8818c174f000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa06ff395>] ? test_spinlock+0x65/0x90 [locktest]
[<ffffffffa06ff785>] etime_show+0xd5/0x120 [locktest]
[<ffffffff812a2dc6>] kobj_attr_show+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff8121a7fa>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xca/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81218a13>] kernfs_seq_show+0x23/0x30
[<ffffffff811c82db>] seq_read+0xbb/0x400
[<ffffffff812197e5>] kernfs_fop_read+0x35/0x40
[<...
2014 Nov 26
1
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
...5 ffff8818d465e000 ffffffff8164bec0 0000000000000001
0000000000000050 ffff8818b7097e18 ffffffffa06ff785 ffff8818b7097e38
0000000000000246 0000000054755e3a 0000000039f8ba72 ffff8818c174f000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa06ff395>] ? test_spinlock+0x65/0x90 [locktest]
[<ffffffffa06ff785>] etime_show+0xd5/0x120 [locktest]
[<ffffffff812a2dc6>] kobj_attr_show+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff8121a7fa>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xca/0x1b0
[<ffffffff81218a13>] kernfs_seq_show+0x23/0x30
[<ffffffff811c82db>] seq_read+0xbb/0x400
[<ffffffff812197e5>] kernfs_fop_read+0x35/0x40
[<...
2014 Oct 27
5
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
On 10/24/2014 04:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:10:38PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> Since enabling paravirt spinlock will disable unlock function inlining,
>> a jump label can be added to the unlock function without adding patch
>> sites all over the kernel.
> But you don't have to. My patches allowed for the inline to remain,
> again
2014 Oct 27
5
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
On 10/24/2014 04:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:10:38PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> Since enabling paravirt spinlock will disable unlock function inlining,
>> a jump label can be added to the unlock function without adding patch
>> sites all over the kernel.
> But you don't have to. My patches allowed for the inline to remain,
> again