search for: etica

My gateway is showing these messages: htb*g j=4929 htb*r7 m=0 htb*r6 m=0 htb*r5 m=0 htb*r4 m=0 htb*r3 m=0 htb*r2 m=0 htb*r1 m=0 htb*r0 m=0 HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. What does it means ? Thanks, Luciano Lima _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Hi. On Mar 12, Corey Hickey posted here(http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q1/012038.html) an updated esfq patch for kernel 2.6. Has anyone backported it to kernel 2.4 ? Original esfq patch is not being kept in sync with kernel sfq, it seems. What people have been using with esfq and kernel 2.4.25, the original 2002 esfq patch ? Rubens

Hello list, I''m developing an application that needs to number the TC rule (and keep it in a internal array table) to be possibly deleted later if its needed. I didn''t find a easy way to do that and will be thankful if somebody can help me. Sorry if the question has a simple answer ... I''m a beginner in TC ... :-) Happy 2004 ...

...might be interesting to check how the firewall does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the packet has been transmitted, to prevent the immediate retries, while actually vanishing the packet. Aron --__--__-- Message: 8 From: "Roy" <roy@xxx.lt> To: <rubens@etica.net> Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Subject: Re: [LARTC] NEW imq driver Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:42:29 +0200 Seems I was to fast to declare success, my version is not much more stable than the original one,everything depends on dropped packets. This is even not imq fault afterall, can be p...

We run a Hosting farm behind a bridge/iptables firewall setup running Gentoo with kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r6, connected to a dual 15Mbps international internet pipe / , as this: Net Pipe --------- eth1 Bridge/Firewall eth0 -------- Internal Hosting Network lately we have been looking at htb to somehow control excessive usage from the users behind, but in our implementation there seems to be an

Hi, Partly because I never like straightforward solutions, I am looking to implement a non-standard failover system that owes its origins to mixing RAID 5 with some beer. The idea is to have machines A, B and C, configured as follows: 1) Any given process is running on TWO machines at the same time. If a process or machine fails, then a new backup is started on the third machine. There is thus

Some time ago someone posted a nice script to monitor HTB classes, classmon.pl. A friend of mine ported it to CBQ, and attached is the result. Suggestions are welcome. Rubens > #!/usr/bin/perl > > # Classy CBQ Operations Monitor...in Perl > # Based on classmon.pl by Toby Cantor > # By BLFC > > # The following short command line options are parsed as you might expect. >