search for: ethtool_options

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 23 matches for "ethtool_options".

2015 Mar 16
2
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
...s is my setup: pc63422:/etc/sysconfig/network # cat ifcfg-br0 BOOTPROTO='dhcp4' TYPE='Bridge' BRIDGE='yes' DEVICE='br0' BRIDGE_FORWARDDELAY='0' BRIDGE_PORTS='eth0' BRIDGE_STP='off' BROADCAST='' DHCLIENT_SET_DEFAULT_ROUTE='yes' ETHTOOL_OPTIONS='' IPADDR='' MTU='' NAME='' NETMASK='' NETWORK='' REMOTE_IPADDR='' STARTMODE='auto' USERCONTROL='no pc63422:/etc/sysconfig/network # cat ifcfg-eth0 # BOOTPROTO='dhcp' BROADCAST='' ETHTOOL_OPTIONS='' IPADDR=...
2016 Jan 07
3
Samba over slow connections
Hi list (and happy new year), I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over VPN. Basically we've following setup : PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost always ends up with a NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error (or "a network error occured" if trying to copy from
2011 May 30
4
OpenSUSE 11.4 (2.6.39-30.1), Xen 4.0.2 - Device 0 (vif) Could not be connected
All, This is a fresh, un-f#$ked-with OpenSUSE install after adding the Tumbleweed repository and doing a dup. I installed the Hypervisor with Tools for which it prompted me for Xen or QEMU and I chose Xen. No bridge was made. When I go to create a fully virtualised machine, it nao has the error: Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Could not find the bridge, and none was specified.
2009 Jul 08
0
Correct way to disble TCP Segmentation Offload (tso off) in CentOS 5
Hi, What's the correct way to disble TSO (TCP Segmentation Offload) in RHEL5? I have tried adding those options in ifcfg-ethX configuration file: # grep ETHTOOL /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 ETHTOOL_OPTS="tso off" And also with: ETHTOOL_OPTS="-K eth0 tso off" But when restating the server TSO is enabled: # ethtool -k eth0 tcp segmentation offload: on As
2007 Sep 05
2
Hard-set network via ifup scripts...
Anyone know off the top of their head the "right" way to hard set a link automatically to 100Mbps Full Duplex, etc using the ifup or ifcfg files? Don't see options in the scripts that might cover this, but maybe there's a more elegant way to do it than to do something in rc.local or hack up the ifup files myself... Ray
2011 Sep 05
5
Unable to connect
Hello, I have been using xen under open-suse 11.4 for almost half an year now. This week I had to reformat the provider and so I did install everything again (now there is a dual boot and microsoft windows server 2008 installed on the first half partition of the disk) again open-suse 11.4 and xen. I do start the xen kernel at grub but when I try to connect and/or creat a new domU the folling
2015 Mar 17
2
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
...p4' >> TYPE='Bridge' >> BRIDGE='yes' >> DEVICE='br0' >> BRIDGE_FORWARDDELAY='0' >> BRIDGE_PORTS='eth0' >> BRIDGE_STP='off' >> BROADCAST='' >> DHCLIENT_SET_DEFAULT_ROUTE='yes' >> ETHTOOL_OPTIONS='' >> IPADDR='' >> MTU='' >> NAME='' >> NETMASK='' >> NETWORK='' >> REMOTE_IPADDR='' >> STARTMODE='auto' >> USERCONTROL='no >> >> pc63422:/etc/sysconfig/network # cat ifcf...
2006 Apr 16
4
force 10 megabit full duplex
I figured out how to force 10 megabit full duplex on my ethernet interface. The trick is i need it to stick in case of a reboot so i don't have to reforce it. I have not been able to figure that one out yet. I have not found it in the man's or google yet. If someone could point me in the right direction i would be much obliged. -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No
2015 Mar 16
0
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
...k # cat ifcfg-br0 BOOTPROTO='dhcp4' > TYPE='Bridge' > BRIDGE='yes' > DEVICE='br0' > BRIDGE_FORWARDDELAY='0' > BRIDGE_PORTS='eth0' > BRIDGE_STP='off' > BROADCAST='' > DHCLIENT_SET_DEFAULT_ROUTE='yes' > ETHTOOL_OPTIONS='' > IPADDR='' > MTU='' > NAME='' > NETMASK='' > NETWORK='' > REMOTE_IPADDR='' > STARTMODE='auto' > USERCONTROL='no > > pc63422:/etc/sysconfig/network # cat ifcfg-eth0 # BOOTPROTO='dhcp' > B...
2015 Mar 16
2
still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
Hi, i'm currently installing a SLES 12 64bit system. libvirt-client-1.2.5-13.3.x86_64 and libvirt-daemon-1.2.5-13.3.x86_64. Formerly I created my vm's (KVM) using a traditional bridge in my host systems, mostly SLES 11 SP3. But with SLES 12 I don't succeed. I can use the macvtap device in the host, but I like to be able to communicate between host and guest. Is the traditional bridge
2015 Mar 19
0
Re: still possible to use traditional bridge network setup ?
...gt; >> BRIDGE='yes' > >> DEVICE='br0' > >> BRIDGE_FORWARDDELAY='0' > >> BRIDGE_PORTS='eth0' > >> BRIDGE_STP='off' > >> BROADCAST='' > >> DHCLIENT_SET_DEFAULT_ROUTE='yes' > >> ETHTOOL_OPTIONS='' > >> IPADDR='' > >> MTU='' > >> NAME='' > >> NETMASK='' > >> NETWORK='' > >> REMOTE_IPADDR='' > >> STARTMODE='auto' > >> USERCONTROL='no > >> >...
2018 Aug 09
4
bad udp cksum
Hi, Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue. My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via 514/udp, however I'm not receiving anything. I did the following on CentOS *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* In another session on the same server: *nc syslog-server -u 514* tcpdump started to show me messages like: *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG,
2018 Aug 10
0
bad udp cksum
> Hi, > > Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue. > My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via 514/udp, > however I'm not receiving anything. > > I did the following on CentOS > *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* > > In another session on the same server: > *nc syslog-server -u 514* > > tcpdump started to show me
2016 Jan 07
0
Samba over slow connections
Am 07.01.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Hi list (and happy new year), > > I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over > VPN. Basically we've following setup : > > PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server > > Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost > always ends up with a
2016 Jan 07
1
Samba over slow connections
Le 07/01/2016 12:22, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 100 > ______________________________________________ > > ifcfg-eth0: > > ETHTOOL_OPTS="-K ${DEVICE} tso on lro off; -G ${DEVICE} rx 128 tx 128" > ______________________________________________ > > sysctl.conf: > > net.core.rmem_max = 65536 > net.core.wmem_max = 65536
2007 Feb 07
0
Routing issue?
Hi, At first glance, this appears to be a fairly simple routing issue, but I''ve checked the configuration and am a bit mystified. I am using Xen 3.0.2 here in bridged networking mode. Firstly - four servers. Dom0 - 75.126.2.202 (RHEL4) domU (CentOS) - 75.126.3.248 -> 75.126.3.251 Dom0, .248, & .249 can all talk to each other okay (& the outside world) However, for some
2019 Feb 14
5
Centos 7.6 & ether-wake
Everyone, I have not been able to get ether-wake to work waking up other centos 7.6 machines after the upgrade to Centos 7.6. Has anyone else had this problem, and if so any luck with a fix? Greg Ennis
2011 Jan 07
2
Could not setup Speed and Duplex on CentOS 5.5
Greetings, I recently installed CentOS 5 on Dell PE 1750 server. I have noticed that the speed and duplex settings are 100 Half Duplex. I tried to change the duplex settings to full, but no success. I got the error message "Cannot get current device settings: Operation not supported". Does anyone else experience this issue?. Below is the error message and some more details about my box.
2008 Sep 09
15
Need help with an odd issue I am experiencing
I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back at 5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my laptop to the same modem, same port, using the same cable and I get 17mb down. I have ruled out iptables, nics (because same result on both nics), cables, cable modem(with
2007 May 01
4
Sftp slow on both our centos installs
The short version. Copying over SFTP to our centos boxes maxes out at 2MB a sec. The Question: Is there some sort of speed limitation somewhere in the ssh/sftp daemon? Does anyone have any idea why this could be happening? The long version We have centos 4.6 installed on 2 different machines, different hardware, different nics. Even on 2 different subnets. I've tried different switches,