Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "ethernet1".
Did you mean:
ethernet
2007 May 04
1
Multiple SA in the same IPSec tunnel
Hi,
When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the
"normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each
direction of the tunnel.
However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and
racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of
SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with
2019 Jan 14
2
Various extensions ring once and go to voicemail
...* SSH * ONLINE * Apache * ONLINE * Iptables * OFFLINE *
* Fail2ban * OFFLINE * IP Connect* ONLINE * Ip6tables * OFFLINE *
* BlueTooth * ONLINE * Hidd * ONLINE * NTPD * ONLINE *
* Sendmail * ONLINE * Samba * OFFLINE * Webmin * LOADING *
* Ethernet0 * ONLINE * Ethernet1 * ONLINE * Wlan0 * N/A *
********************************************************************
* Running Asterisk Version : Asterisk 1.8.7.0
* Asterisk Source Version : 1.8.7.0
* Dahdi Source Version : 2.5.0.1+2.5.0.1
* Libpri Source Version : 1.4.12
* Addons Source Version : 1....
2018 Dec 05
2
Re: [PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 0/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
...er conversion we preserve the MAC address and add virtio drivers,
but the new netkvm.sys driver just adds a new network interface so
it'll end up like this:
(no hardware) 192.168.128.10 vmxnet3 "Ethernet0" EnableDHCP=0
00:50:56:01:02:03 (no address) netkvm "Ethernet1" EnableDHCP=1
It has no address in the second case because this is a non-DHCP
network. (The DHCP situation is better because the second network
will be assigned the right IP address because of the preserved MAC
address, although it still has the unnecessary network adapter.)
Note that Wind...
2006 Jul 18
7
Port scan from Apache?
...using the company's hardware.
Apparently, the company uses NetScreen hardware and/or software for such
intrusion detection / prevention mechanisms and the log he provided read:
[Root]system-alert-00016: Port scan! From $my-server-ip:80 to
$their-server-ip:8254, proto TCP (zone Untrust, int ethernet1). Occurred
1 times.
My questions are:
1. Can this be malicious code on my side? Both port 80 and 443 are bound
to Apache's httpd so they shouldn't be available to other processes, right?
2. I'm using ipfw as a firewall where everything is denied except for a
rather tight permitting...
2019 Jan 14
2
Various extensions ring once and go to voicemail
...* SSH * ONLINE * Apache * ONLINE * Iptables * OFFLINE *
* Fail2ban * OFFLINE * IP Connect* ONLINE * Ip6tables * OFFLINE *
* BlueTooth * ONLINE * Hidd * ONLINE * NTPD * ONLINE *
* Sendmail * ONLINE * Samba * OFFLINE * Webmin * LOADING *
* Ethernet0 * ONLINE * Ethernet1 * ONLINE * Wlan0 * N/A *
********************************************************************
* Running Asterisk Version : Asterisk 1.8.7.0
* Asterisk Source Version : 1.8.7.0
* Dahdi Source Version : 2.5.0.1+2.5.0.1
* Libpri Source Version : 1.4.12
* Addons Source Version : 1....
2018 Dec 05
1
Re: [PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 0/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
...virtio drivers,
> > but the new netkvm.sys driver just adds a new network interface so
> > it'll end up like this:
> >
> > (no hardware) 192.168.128.10 vmxnet3 "Ethernet0" EnableDHCP=0
> > 00:50:56:01:02:03 (no address) netkvm "Ethernet1" EnableDHCP=1
> >
> > It has no address in the second case because this is a non-DHCP
> > network. (The DHCP situation is better because the second network
> > will be assigned the right IP address because of the preserved MAC
> > address, although it still has...
2018 Dec 05
0
Re: [PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 0/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
...virtio drivers,
> > but the new netkvm.sys driver just adds a new network interface so
> > it'll end up like this:
> >
> > (no hardware) 192.168.128.10 vmxnet3 "Ethernet0" EnableDHCP=0
> > 00:50:56:01:02:03 (no address) netkvm "Ethernet1" EnableDHCP=1
> >
> > It has no address in the second case because this is a non-DHCP
> > network. (The DHCP situation is better because the second network
> > will be assigned the right IP address because of the preserved MAC
> > address, although it still has...
2018 Dec 05
0
Re: [PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 0/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
...e the MAC address and add virtio drivers,
> but the new netkvm.sys driver just adds a new network interface so
> it'll end up like this:
>
> (no hardware) 192.168.128.10 vmxnet3 "Ethernet0" EnableDHCP=0
> 00:50:56:01:02:03 (no address) netkvm "Ethernet1" EnableDHCP=1
>
> It has no address in the second case because this is a non-DHCP
> network. (The DHCP situation is better because the second network
> will be assigned the right IP address because of the preserved MAC
> address, although it still has the unnecessary network a...
2006 Feb 08
0
possible fraud attempt and phising on my mail logs
...canner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "10.2.0.0" claiming to be MailScanner
warning: numerical links are often malicious: 10.2.0.0/16- Show quoted text -
Thanks in advance if anyone can spot the problem here. \n
PIX Version 6.3(3)
interface ethernet0 auto
interface ethernet1 \n auto
nameif ethernet0 outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside \n security100
enable password ** encrypted
passwd ** encrypted
hostname \n pix-evn
domain-name **
clock timezone CST -6
clock summer-time CDT \n recurring
fixup protocol dns maximum-length 700
fixup protocol ftp \n 21
fixup p...
2018 Dec 04
2
[PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY 0/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
This patch is just for discussion. There are still a couple of issues
that I'm trying to fix.
One is that all of the test guests I have, even ones with static IPs,
have multiple interfaces, some using DHCP, so the conditions for
adding the Powershell script don't kick in. This makes testing very
awkward.
However a bigger issue is that I think the premise is wrong. In some
registries