Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "etherfast".
Did you mean:
ethercat
1999 Sep 07
2
Samba slower than FTP?
Hello gurus,
I have samba fileserver 2.0.5a installed on Reliant UNIX 5.44 (Siemens
UNIX). All works fine but now I need to get as much speed from it as it
can provide. I have this UNIX box and an NT 4.0 Server in the same FDDI
ring. When I try to copy an 180 Mb file via FTP to local hard disk the
transfer rate is 1014,16 Kb/sec. But while copying it from the samba
share to the same location by
2000 Jun 08
1
interface negotiation questions (slightly off-topic)
.... I noticed that network performance seemed slow (when working with apache cgi stuff) and when I actually timed some file transfers (both SMB and ftp) I was getting anywhere from 50 - 150 k/sec. Huh? This is supposed to be a 100 Mbps full duplex network (segmented with 4 8-port switches; LinkSys EtherFast 10/100s - about $180 each). When I used the dmesg command on the linux box, all I could see was:
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
eth0: Transmit error...
1999 Sep 09
1
SAMBA digest 2226
...le is genuinely harmful).
>- Hope for the best.
>
>On my LAN I tend to get around 2mb per second on get's and 3.x mb per
>second on puts with Samba, this compares to about 2mb per second on gets
>and 6mb per second on puts with FTP. All the machines involved are using
>LinkSys Etherfast 10/100 cards connected to a LinkSys 10/100 hub.
>Oddly enough when I connected a 10mbit/s client to the hub and tried samba
>out I got about 750kb/s put and 900kb/s get. . . If anyone can explain this
>I'm listening :)
>--
>
>Who is this General Failure, and why is he reading...