search for: eth3

Hello, We have 3 DSL connections connected to eth3 and another interface with a dedicated link in eth0 (main table) We want to balance selected traffic (using fwmark and iptables) through our 3 DSL connections in a secondary table named DSL (without using the dedicated link in eth0), but the next command is not accepted, and gives us the follow...

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:7 classid 1:20 htb rate 180...

...domU with internal services (DHCP-, LDAP-, SAMBA-, ... Server) - 1 domU in DMZ as Webserver My plan: - xenbr0 where eth0 is in it and all my internal domX - xenbr1 where eth1 is in it and all my DMZ domX - xenbr2 where eth2 is in it (WLAN Access Point attached) - xenbr3 where eth0, eth1, eth2 and eth3 for the firewall What I have so far: - Xen installed and dom0 running - xenbr0, xenbr1, xenbr2 and xenbr3 created via custom script: #!/bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$...

..., gw is 83.111.160.5), and they route an additional block 83.111.196.56/29 (83.111.196.57 to 83.111.196.62 useable) over the link. I have a Debian box, and the routed block IP?s are setup as aliases. I have setup the box to accept ssh and ping for each IP alias. /etc/network/interfaces auto eth3 iface eth3 inet static address 83.111.160.6 netmask 255.255.255.252 up ip addr add 83.111.196.57/29 brd 83.111.196.63 dev eth3 label eth3:0 up ip addr add 83.111.196.58/29 brd 83.111.196.63 dev eth3 label eth3:1 up ip addr add 83.111.196.59/29 brd 83.111.196.63 dev eth3 label eth3:2 up...

Hi, I managed to fix 128kbit for an IP address of 192.168.200.3 as below: - tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 128kbit allot 1500 prio 5 bounded isolated tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst 192.168.200.3 flowid 1:1 tc qdisc add dev eth3 parent 1:1 sfq perturb 10 How can I...

Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux box configured as a bridge. One interface connects to the router via a crossover cable, the other connects to a switch via the cable that used to go to the router. Now I get the following: [root@localhost net]# ifconfig eth3 eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:2D:07:61:5D UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1969134 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:176459 TX packets:2186662 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000...

...or my college. There are two different types of users; students and conference guests, and they have IPs statically assigned by DHCP, from separate ranges (but they are on the same subnet). The students go out onto an academic connection (via eth0), and conference guests go out on an ADSL line (via eth3). eth1 and eth2 are configured for internal use. My question is this (and I''m not 100% sure if it''s a firewall or routing issue, hence the post to both mailing lists). I have some firewall rules in place which direct packets out to a specific ethernet device, depending on the IP...

ok i will do it in text: 66.92.114.46 eth0 209.141.2.194 eth1 192.168.119.101 eth2 192.168.120.101 eth3 What i have is a linux box RH7.3 which will eventually run Shorewall Firewall. On this box there is eth0 66.92.114.46 conneted to isp1 and eth1 209.141.2.194 connected to isp2 It also has eth2 192.168.119.101 and eth3 192.168.120.101 which will connect to a failover appliance which has 2 wan inte...

Hi All, I''m using HTB to shape traffic, a little like this: tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 htb tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1:0 htb tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action ipt -j MARK --or-mark 0x01000000 tc filter add dev eth3 parent 1: protocol 0x8100 prio 5 u32 match u16 3000 0x0fff at 0 flowid 1:1 action ipt -j MARK --or-mark 0x01000000...

Hi, I have a linux router with 4 ethernet cards; eth0 through eth3. Basically, all I want to do is route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and all traffic from eth1 to eth3. I''ve looked through the LARTC how-to, specifically at chapter 4, about multiple providers. However, I am still a bit confused, and not sure how to set up my routing tables, as my scenar...

...I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here''s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.1 203.96.216.0/24 via 203.96.212.1 dev eth3 proto static src 203.96.213.73 203.96.212.0/23 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 203.96.213.73 172.30.0.0/20 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 172.30.7.4 127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1 dev lo scope link rama-kandra root #cat /etc/init.d/multi_routes ebegin "Starting Mul...

...anyway ;) I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here’s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.1 203.96.216.0/24 via 203.96.212.1 dev eth3 proto static src 203.96.213.73 203.96.212.0/23 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 203.96.213.73 172.30.0.0/20 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 172.30.7.4 127.0.0.0/8 via 127.0.0.1 dev lo scope link rama-kandra root #cat /etc/init.d/multi_routes ebegin "Starting Mul...

Hi, Apologies for the cross-posting; I''m not sure whether this is a firewall or routing issue, or both! I have four network cards, detailed below. eth0 and eth3 connect to my ISPs, and eth1 and eth2 connect to local networks. I want to route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and from eth1 to eth3. However, I am having a few problems with this. eth0 ip: 192.168.100.253/24 gw: 192.168.100.254 (ISP) eth1 ip: 192.168.3.253/22 gw: 192.168.20.253 (eth3) eth2 ip:...

Hello, I''m having such problem with HFSC with following config: + tc qdisc del dev eth3 root + tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: hfsc default 2 + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 512kbit ul rate 512kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 2kbit ul rate 400kbit + tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 hfsc ls rate 32kbit ul ra...

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | | | -------------- Internal Router -------------- LAN1 LAN2 LAN3 I''ve add 3 records to rt_tables file...

....../arp_accept=0 not present in old kernel. Additionally I tested on old system new quagga version (0.99.15 as in new system) -- was working OK. On new system I run iptrace. For symmetric ICMP packet from external source to my gate 195.187.140.1 I obtain: > TRACE: raw:PREROUTING:policy:2 IN=eth3 OUT= SRC=83.3.197.202 DST=195.187.140.1 LEN=28 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=59 ID=48172 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 ID=49174 SEQ=37889 > TRACE: mangle:PREROUTING:rule:1 IN=eth3 OUT= SRC=83.3.197.202 DST=195.187.140.1 LEN=28 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=59 ID=48172 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 ID=49174 SEQ=37889 &g...

I am running a public core router using private links from my provider. Details: RH7.3 9 interfaces (all Intel) eth0 is default gateway and has a private IP address all other interfaces are links to other routers or networks eth3 has a public IP address The core router will rarely need to access sites out on the internet, but when it does it cannot get there because the eth0 has a private IP address. Is there a way to force the router to use the ip address from eth3 to access sites on the internet? If so, how would I route...

...ed to two different networks in two different ways: One network, on interface eth0, is the local network, the SAMBA server is the main file server for this network, and so I assume it would be best if the SAMBA server were the "master" on this network. The other network, on interface eth3, is someone else's network. I am trying to make my SAMBA server as invisible as possible on this network, whilst still allowing file sharing. I set this up as seemed to make sense, and it worked to my expectations. However, the single remote PC (Windows XP) on the eth3 network that was acc...

...advance for any advice. I''m working on a 4 port firewall system. It is running heartbeat+drbd. Primary box looks like this: eth0 -> net/cicso router 192.168.144.2/29 eth1 -> drbd/heartbeat crossover cable 192.168.254.253/30 eth2 -> dmz 192.168.144.10/24 eth3 -> loc 192.168.101.2/24 The IP''s of the secondary box are one number higher. The hardware is the same, and the OS was imaged from the primary machine. So when I try to ping from the secondary box to the primary, the primary spits out kernel log rejecting on smurfs. I edit in...

It seems like tos should be considered when sorting routes on insertion. Consider this out-of-order route creation: # ip route add 1.1.0.0/24 table 3 nexthop via 192.168.0.23 # ip route add 1.1.0.1/32 table 3 nexthop via 192.168.0.24 # ip route show table 3 1.1.0.1 via 192.168.0.24 dev eth3 1.1.0.0/24 via 192.168.0.23 dev eth3 ok... it''s re-ordered the routes - it makes sense, the host route would have been masked by the net route, but what about this: # ip route add 1.1.0.0/24 tos 0x15 table 3 nexthop via 192.168.0.23 # ip route add 1.1.0.1/32 table 3 nexthop via 192.168.0...